{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6","short_pith_number":"pith:7NQRVKND","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fb611aa9a3af96427037d31076bfea578dd49ee47347167c2961b54bfd99c1d3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.01008","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Multiple Testing in Generalized Universal Inference","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jonathan P. Williams, Neil Dey, Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2024-12-01T23:55:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. If the goal is to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously, one can construct e-values for each individual test and then use the recently developed e-BH procedure to properly correct for multiplicity. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This paper demonstrates that the generalized universal inference framework can be used along with the e-BH procedure to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.01008","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2024-12-01T23:55:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d9095574bbbebe153ced00df4bc0eeba1ab3210f8c42b2dd93c2de357dd3be62","abstract_canon_sha256":"2ea01219e1b495d1557a4c053de88f7b9df9d75ed98af9d427923930589c8d3b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012796Z","signature_b64":"m1AtuWQJU6tnm0LJi/s6GaT/AETvoKG0VxRTA+hZrobEobawZTYkq9H3CmOe3KeWHSWP0TksBPLotMJYY8xKCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fb611aa9a3af96427037d31076bfea578dd49ee47347167c2961b54bfd99c1d3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012250Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012250Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Multiple Testing in Generalized Universal Inference","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jonathan P. Williams, Neil Dey, Ryan Martin","submitted_at":"2024-12-01T23:55:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. If the goal is to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously, one can construct e-values for each individual test and then use the recently developed e-BH procedure to properly correct for multiplicity. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This paper demonstrates that the generalized universal inference framework can be used along with the e-BH procedure to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.01008","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.01008/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.01008","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.01008v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.01008","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7NQRVKNDV6LE","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7NQRVKND","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.09090","citing_title":"Sequential Scoring Rule Evaluation for Forecast Method Selection","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7NQRVKND"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7NQRVKND","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.01008&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7NQRVKNDV6LEE4BX2MIHNP7KK6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:52.012307+00:00"}