{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2025:7ODCUGMLJH2E7LQVT3RYDCGA5N","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"c647fce552325a36c687d27c34d821edb496177116c726b8cbb0a5e25531cd6c","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SY"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"eess.SY","submitted_at":"2025-11-11T17:34:28Z","title_canon_sha256":"729f7bdde93635a35fd9404f637dea7a7be036aaad16dbf42d7e3a5c741e2ef8"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2511.08499","kind":"arxiv","version":3}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2511.08499","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2511.08499v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2511.08499","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7ODCUGMLJH2E","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7ODCUGMLJH2E7LQV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7ODCUGML","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:51e470a87ead9e0925f08807e4ab7ce02958dcda3422ca3eee0d094ddc45fe85","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"We contribute to the state of the art in terms of process guidance on argumentation creation and maintenance - aiming to promote a safety-argumentation-by-design paradigm, which mandates co-developing both the system and argumentation from the earliest stages."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That extending the systematic design model with an argumentation layer reveals limitations that are best addressed by a separate dedicated life cycle whose phases (baselining, evolution, continuous maintenance) can be implemented via literature- and expert-derived requirements."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Introduces a requirement-based safety argumentation life cycle to promote co-development of automated vehicle systems and their safety arguments from the start."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"A dedicated life cycle for safety argumentation lets developers co-build the case for acceptable residual risk alongside the automated vehicle system from the start."}],"snapshot_sha256":"ab45be9b806941b62d12f2d88e486b59b6440c994d3ae107ad3155fde7e7b8bb"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Despite the growing number of automated vehicles on public roads, operating such systems in open contexts inevitably involves incidents. Developing a defensible case that the residual risk is reduced to a reasonable (societally acceptable) level is hence a prerequisite to be prepared for potential liability cases. A \"safety argumentation\" is a common means to represent this case. In this paper, we contribute to the state of the art in terms of process guidance on argumentation creation and maintenance - aiming to promote a safety-argumentation-by-design paradigm, which mandates co-developing b","authors_text":"Andreas Dotzler, Marcus Nolte, Markus Maurer, Marvin Loba, Nayel Fabian Salem, Niklas Braun, Richard Schubert, Robert Graubohm, Torben Stolte","cross_cats":["cs.SY"],"headline":"A dedicated life cycle for safety argumentation lets developers co-build the case for acceptable residual risk alongside the automated vehicle system from the start.","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"eess.SY","submitted_at":"2025-11-11T17:34:28Z","title":"Approaching Safety-Argumentation-by-Design: A Requirement-based Safety Argumentation Life Cycle for Automated Vehicles"},"references":{"count":36,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":36,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/1426","work_id":"6bf290ab-0449-432e-ac42-ec262b1c8e33","year":2022},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Safety and Acceptance – A View of Two Mysteries,","work_id":"707d9aeb-5e0d-4bc5-86bb-c10dde0936ec","year":2023},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"M. Nolte et al. , Anmerkungen zu Sicherheit und Risiken autonomer Straßenfahrzeuge — Teil 1 & 2 . C.H. BECK, Neue Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht, 5/25 (pp. 198-207), continued in 6/25 (pp. 241-251)","work_id":"a2826ad5-de60-4d9a-a0cc-73f5540c745e","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"(Vision Zero) – an ethical approach to safety and mobility,","work_id":"ba20b0a4-75f5-495d-bf5d-df9801340a44","year":2000},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"A Review of Conceptualizations of Safety and Risk in Current Automated Driving Regulation,","work_id":"03145d0d-63a5-44a1-9e6c-46d39de6c0cd","year":2025}],"snapshot_sha256":"e78957aae1f628e0a0517d71c79487cfcf7a4102d822b2228a043a93d0978dd1"},"source":{"id":"2511.08499","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:21:08.903147Z","id":"b7079539-0a40-473f-96a8-e33b41cf46c8","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Introduces a requirement-based safety argumentation life cycle to promote co-development of automated vehicle systems and their safety arguments from the start.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"A dedicated life cycle for safety argumentation lets developers co-build the case for acceptable residual risk alongside the automated vehicle system from the start.","strongest_claim":"We contribute to the state of the art in terms of process guidance on argumentation creation and maintenance - aiming to promote a safety-argumentation-by-design paradigm, which mandates co-developing both the system and argumentation from the earliest stages.","weakest_assumption":"That extending the systematic design model with an argumentation layer reveals limitations that are best addressed by a separate dedicated life cycle whose phases (baselining, evolution, continuous maintenance) can be implemented via literature- and expert-derived requirements."}},"verdict_id":"b7079539-0a40-473f-96a8-e33b41cf46c8"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:7d1c5f695c75529b11a2dfce38077c1fce60ba0155f365e62bb75f9f982b7d59","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"c647fce552325a36c687d27c34d821edb496177116c726b8cbb0a5e25531cd6c","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SY"],"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"eess.SY","submitted_at":"2025-11-11T17:34:28Z","title_canon_sha256":"729f7bdde93635a35fd9404f637dea7a7be036aaad16dbf42d7e3a5c741e2ef8"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2511.08499","kind":"arxiv","version":3}},"canonical_sha256":"fb862a198b49f44fae159ee38188c0eb4f64db075575829dcc22da633ed21137","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"fb862a198b49f44fae159ee38188c0eb4f64db075575829dcc22da633ed21137","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32.977869Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32.977869Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"exba/YE/kk/ugW03nLkea0QVhB3BQzObxPs1tOcUp8iqbvqUEpVln8cz5GZYrDxlJIV8mo8L8lc3oO0k12kTDQ==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:44:32.978444Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2511.08499","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":3}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:7d1c5f695c75529b11a2dfce38077c1fce60ba0155f365e62bb75f9f982b7d59","sha256:51e470a87ead9e0925f08807e4ab7ce02958dcda3422ca3eee0d094ddc45fe85"],"state_sha256":"d469c7288f0006c3371ae6459362b6b0a1a6be1997c93661d89e4950fa03fda8"}