{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S","short_pith_number":"pith:7PLKTR26","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fbd6a9c75ef6acdb4d398695f25fb2ec8581d1cc6d731b82b4c50b7243e80404","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.16989","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Decision-Aware Proximal Bridge Learning for Optimal Treatment Selection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"A policy-targeted weighted bridge loss controls treatment-selection regret through a weighted ill-posedness constant in proximal causal inference.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alejandro Almod\\'ovar, Axel Brando, Eduard Serrahima de Cambra, Gerard Sanz, Juan Parras, Tom\\`as Garriga","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T13:20:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Individualized treatment selection with continuous actions requires accurate causal response estimation in decision-relevant regions, rather than uniformly over the entire action space. Estimating a global causal response surface and then choosing the treatment that maximizes it can therefore be suboptimal, since standard estimation objectives allocate modeling effort according to the observed treatment distribution rather than the regions that determine the optimal decision. While decision-aware approaches have been studied in unconfounded settings, this problem remains underexplored in proxi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.16989","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T13:20:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"447417b130ff6be53c9c0a4eb35a30fbf262069d7204d24137934180acf1fa83","abstract_canon_sha256":"d487646a115efb53f416e9fcb2c34d909c67749ecce4939c63d75b43cb83b7b7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.780219Z","signature_b64":"LTKyxmx+jVyq92y5El4fxt+3OWM3AcvGbszWdR+wDwZ2CEJmOMGOlb8dMr6M2ULWxZI9Q2wUXfTCz4y9H5kZDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fbd6a9c75ef6acdb4d398695f25fb2ec8581d1cc6d731b82b4c50b7243e80404","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779483Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779483Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Decision-Aware Proximal Bridge Learning for Optimal Treatment Selection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"A policy-targeted weighted bridge loss controls treatment-selection regret through a weighted ill-posedness constant in proximal causal inference.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alejandro Almod\\'ovar, Axel Brando, Eduard Serrahima de Cambra, Gerard Sanz, Juan Parras, Tom\\`as Garriga","submitted_at":"2026-05-16T13:20:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Individualized treatment selection with continuous actions requires accurate causal response estimation in decision-relevant regions, rather than uniformly over the entire action space. Estimating a global causal response surface and then choosing the treatment that maximizes it can therefore be suboptimal, since standard estimation objectives allocate modeling effort according to the observed treatment distribution rather than the regions that determine the optimal decision. While decision-aware approaches have been studied in unconfounded settings, this problem remains underexplored in proxi"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We prove a regret bound showing that the proposed weighted bridge loss controls treatment-selection regret through a weighted ill-posedness constant.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The proximal causal inference identification assumptions hold, including the existence of suitable bridge functions and proxy variables that recover causal effects despite hidden confounding, and that the decision-aware weighting preserves identification.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Introduces decision-aware proximal bridge learning using a weighted loss and regret bound to enhance optimal treatment selection in settings with hidden confounding.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"A policy-targeted weighted bridge loss controls treatment-selection regret through a weighted ill-posedness constant in proximal causal inference.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"23c9f866452bc2cd73bb618ae45a508b1a465a399f861afeffe358f574a1c679"},"source":{"id":"2605.16989","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"8268dde4-a9ac-4d29-8360-1498641e43f6","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-19T20:54:57.459064Z","strongest_claim":"We prove a regret bound showing that the proposed weighted bridge loss controls treatment-selection regret through a weighted ill-posedness constant.","one_line_summary":"Introduces decision-aware proximal bridge learning using a weighted loss and regret bound to enhance optimal treatment selection in settings with hidden confounding.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The proximal causal inference identification assumptions hold, including the existence of suitable bridge functions and proxy variables that recover causal effects despite hidden confounding, and that the decision-aware weighting preserves identification.","pith_extraction_headline":"A policy-targeted weighted bridge loss controls treatment-selection regret through a weighted ill-posedness constant in proximal causal inference."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.16989/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_title_agreement","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:01:19.052822Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-19T21:00:49.697435Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"citation_quote_validity","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:50:03.342249Z","status":"skipped","version":"0.1.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"cited_work_retraction","ran_at":"2026-05-19T19:23:44.394698Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"claim_evidence","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:41:56.208280Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0},{"name":"ai_meta_artifact","ran_at":"2026-05-19T18:33:26.296883Z","status":"skipped","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"a3ea840b582b647276c2272188bdf050897f2c6b463c2ecb03019001259e760b"},"references":{"count":51,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2019,"title":"Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework","work_id":"7066bcd3-1b71-4513-a527-470daf916aff","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"DeCaFlow: A deconfounding causal generative model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15114, 2025","work_id":"c0087bdc-e07c-48fa-be40-189ad1ac396e","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2011,"title":"Algorithms for hyper- parameter optimization","work_id":"c4170e45-194a-45ea-b281-59f11dc52d68","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"Alaa, James Jordon, and Mihaela van der Schaar","work_id":"6e60be58-be9f-4602-95bd-1a235c80b766","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2020,"title":"Estimating the effects of continuous- valued interventions using generative adversarial networks.Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020","work_id":"b3f64d88-5f36-47e2-92bd-54b989a518b1","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":51,"snapshot_sha256":"53ae62addb62bbf1299ec4407ea3d5ca8a5cecd46e6ed583cc069beaf408f1d6","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":3,"snapshot_sha256":"7d44789eee34850e907f6b31ea9c45084fde5d938914f729dcab79f300f9e14d"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.16989","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.16989v1","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.16989","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7PLKTR2662WN","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7PLKTR2662WNWTJZ","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7PLKTR26","created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":3,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7PLKTR26"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7PLKTR26","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.16989&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7PLKTR2662WNWTJZQ2K7EX5S5S/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-20T00:03:34.779614+00:00"}