{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS","short_pith_number":"pith:7RDERTBB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fc4648cc2160b30a58dbf37538ce7c34b2124177f9900034167cff469d373970","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1807.09037","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Likelihood-based meta-analysis with few studies: Empirical and simulation studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Christian R\\\"over, Svenja E. Seide, Tim Friede","submitted_at":"2018-07-24T11:17:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard random-effects meta-analysis methods perform poorly when applied to few studies only. Such settings however are commonly encountered in practice. It is unclear, whether or to what extent small-sample-size behaviour can be improved by more sophisticated modeling.\n  We consider several likelihood-based inference methods. Confidence intervals are based on normal or Student-t approximations. We extract an empirical data set of 40 meta-analyses from recent reviews published by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Methods are then compared empirically as w"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1807.09037","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2018-07-24T11:17:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8ee89a6f212e2018d4ce0ec5831ba58ea1e95c0e4f8d11d19eb98cc5b8191537","abstract_canon_sha256":"0076da4a118d64f9873fd982cd145b31dffc0f874bbc5e23a124868e06d024fb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.615219Z","signature_b64":"7Gq0cyFMIjgKBK3T8HbgiI/nWqEXL7CpKCYwZHYgukG1ipDuZx8WRyXlaSUcioPo3jAYZP7hZ/kqP/8pWqhaCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fc4648cc2160b30a58dbf37538ce7c34b2124177f9900034167cff469d373970","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614793Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614793Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Likelihood-based meta-analysis with few studies: Empirical and simulation studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Christian R\\\"over, Svenja E. Seide, Tim Friede","submitted_at":"2018-07-24T11:17:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Standard random-effects meta-analysis methods perform poorly when applied to few studies only. Such settings however are commonly encountered in practice. It is unclear, whether or to what extent small-sample-size behaviour can be improved by more sophisticated modeling.\n  We consider several likelihood-based inference methods. Confidence intervals are based on normal or Student-t approximations. We extract an empirical data set of 40 meta-analyses from recent reviews published by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Methods are then compared empirically as w"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1807.09037","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1807.09037","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1807.09037v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1807.09037","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614853+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7RDERTBBMCZQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:11.075285+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7RDERTBBMCZQUWG3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:11.075285+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7RDERTBB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:11.075285+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RDERTBB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RDERTBB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1807.09037&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7RDERTBBMCZQUWG36N2TRTT4GS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614853+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:56:29.614853+00:00"}