{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD","short_pith_number":"pith:7RI4MSRE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fc51c64a244b98bc02522d39fce94978e92d3bd8c9b8ccd51a9f4eb339e8118c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2301.11843","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reading and Reasoning over Chart Images for Evidence-based Automated Fact-Checking","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Elena Simperl, Mubashara Akhtar, Oana Cocarascu","submitted_at":"2023-01-27T16:47:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Evidence data for automated fact-checking (AFC) can be in multiple modalities such as text, tables, images, audio, or video. While there is increasing interest in using images for AFC, previous works mostly focus on detecting manipulated or fake images. We propose a novel task, chart-based fact-checking, and introduce ChartBERT as the first model for AFC against chart evidence. ChartBERT leverages textual, structural and visual information of charts to determine the veracity of textual claims. For evaluation, we create ChartFC, a new dataset of 15, 886 charts. We systematically evaluate 75 dif"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2301.11843","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-01-27T16:47:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CV"],"title_canon_sha256":"b2599b072946d3597965db32c0a1a60dbb0cf9065f4ffcd35f41229b4459ecc7","abstract_canon_sha256":"d443835820629ff51c0f93bb15ca220e1ada736540e027844b6caeca77b2c762"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.014203Z","signature_b64":"NAqNjJkLBpcuwFIzpGqlFs7BdsyX/MYToP1OX6yIqt0NaVQeIQii1kg+K4hdC/h6NtqWsBRR0xdDawlaen/xBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fc51c64a244b98bc02522d39fce94978e92d3bd8c9b8ccd51a9f4eb339e8118c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013712Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013712Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reading and Reasoning over Chart Images for Evidence-based Automated Fact-Checking","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Elena Simperl, Mubashara Akhtar, Oana Cocarascu","submitted_at":"2023-01-27T16:47:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Evidence data for automated fact-checking (AFC) can be in multiple modalities such as text, tables, images, audio, or video. While there is increasing interest in using images for AFC, previous works mostly focus on detecting manipulated or fake images. We propose a novel task, chart-based fact-checking, and introduce ChartBERT as the first model for AFC against chart evidence. ChartBERT leverages textual, structural and visual information of charts to determine the veracity of textual claims. For evaluation, we create ChartFC, a new dataset of 15, 886 charts. We systematically evaluate 75 dif"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2301.11843","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2301.11843/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2301.11843","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2301.11843v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2301.11843","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7RI4MSREJOML","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7RI4MSREJOMLYASS","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7RI4MSRE","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.08700","citing_title":"ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RI4MSRE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RI4MSRE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2301.11843&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI4MSREJOMLYASSFU47Z2KJPD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:27.013771+00:00"}