{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6","short_pith_number":"pith:7RI7VAZI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fc51fa832819fbe54da62066c615de47ba91aea3306a2680e4626c0b31c67de5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2608.02185","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Standard Quantum Mechanical Treatment to Rationalize the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Bindiya Arora, Pranvi, Samreet Dhillon, Vipul Badhan","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T13:08:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ever since the proposal of delayed choice quantum erasure and subsequent realization in the experiment by Kim et al., the interpretation and implications of delayed-choice experiments have remained a subject of intense foundational debate. This paper resolves the apparent paradox attached to the experiment using standard quantum mechanics. Using an extended Mach-Zehnder interferometer which captures every operational feature of the original experiment, we show that choosing between which-path and erasure detectors is simply a choice of measurement bases, which does not rewrite a photon's past."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2608.02185","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T13:08:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0f0c649c4e19e685d82ef49ff64bb34e8811a73fb3825e2c6c6878a57a9d7862","abstract_canon_sha256":"688d22be7e058231ddeee313b9afa500618a1437f0b214b63ee73dd1f95796df"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.273970Z","signature_b64":"BBrLqlrxUkMiwAQBq3Gu0wSCV5P0l+kdZx15bnx5le6o2qWeKcQkCP66oBCQOMnR+XDROmeAkNzVBMvC052FDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fc51fa832819fbe54da62066c615de47ba91aea3306a2680e4626c0b31c67de5","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.272498Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.272498Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Standard Quantum Mechanical Treatment to Rationalize the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Bindiya Arora, Pranvi, Samreet Dhillon, Vipul Badhan","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T13:08:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Ever since the proposal of delayed choice quantum erasure and subsequent realization in the experiment by Kim et al., the interpretation and implications of delayed-choice experiments have remained a subject of intense foundational debate. This paper resolves the apparent paradox attached to the experiment using standard quantum mechanics. Using an extended Mach-Zehnder interferometer which captures every operational feature of the original experiment, we show that choosing between which-path and erasure detectors is simply a choice of measurement bases, which does not rewrite a photon's past."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2608.02185","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2608.02185/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2608.02185","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2608.02185v1","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2608.02185","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7RI7VAZIDH56","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7RI7VAZIDH56KTNG","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7RI7VAZI","created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.02185","citing_title":"A Standard Quantum Mechanical Treatment to Rationalize the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RI7VAZI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RI7VAZI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2608.02185&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7RI7VAZIDH56KTNGEBTMMFO6I6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-04T02:11:21.274007+00:00"}