{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R","short_pith_number":"pith:7RQKJ5VG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fc60a4f6a6b4935b4c96d3a540a689fc7de1f9cb7ee6a8ab320595a90e76b157","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.12456","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bowen Fang, Liang Wang, Mengqi Zhang, Pengjie Ren, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Zhumin Chen","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T14:53:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) face challenges with internal knowledge inaccuracies and outdated information. Knowledge editing has emerged as a pivotal approach to mitigate these issues. Although current knowledge editing techniques exhibit promising performance in single-hop reasoning tasks, they show limitations when applied to multi-hop reasoning. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience and the operational mechanisms of LLMs, we hypothesize that the residual single-hop knowledge after editing causes edited models to revert to their original answers when processing multi-hop questions, thereby unde"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.12456","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T14:53:33Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2ace056e9ecb63ad45b3b0da7a57743f310a7f0806ea3b27b2a2dc694f791506","abstract_canon_sha256":"fd0c06f861911d530fc223a42195a1c69e8f982266a1859415ef02e9e8dbcd8b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274904Z","signature_b64":"woQIJ3CPFwBK+l9ieBL453fBS6KkvvKR79p04yWnBdXUjm1B7vZUAsRhasotmaKwk3aiO5JmqXPdQ7SF6f3GBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fc60a4f6a6b4935b4c96d3a540a689fc7de1f9cb7ee6a8ab320595a90e76b157","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274303Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274303Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bowen Fang, Liang Wang, Mengqi Zhang, Pengjie Ren, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Zhumin Chen","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T14:53:33Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) face challenges with internal knowledge inaccuracies and outdated information. Knowledge editing has emerged as a pivotal approach to mitigate these issues. Although current knowledge editing techniques exhibit promising performance in single-hop reasoning tasks, they show limitations when applied to multi-hop reasoning. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience and the operational mechanisms of LLMs, we hypothesize that the residual single-hop knowledge after editing causes edited models to revert to their original answers when processing multi-hop questions, thereby unde"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.12456","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.12456/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.12456","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.12456v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.12456","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7RQKJ5VGWSJV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7RQKJ5VG","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.02660","citing_title":"SocioEval: A Template-Based Framework for Evaluating Socioeconomic Status Bias in Foundation Models","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22951","citing_title":"The Power of Power Law: Asymmetry Enables Compositional Reasoning","ref_index":63,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RQKJ5VG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RQKJ5VG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.12456&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7RQKJ5VGWSJVWTEW2OSUBJUJ7R/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:58:10.274384+00:00"}