{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C","short_pith_number":"pith:7RZRHHH4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fc73139cfc5abefd55e79d139d89fef0b02fe26dbeeac4c34ad1621490dc55d0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.19874","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is In-Context Learning Sufficient for Instruction Following in LLMs?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Francesco Croce, Hao Zhao, Maksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas Flammarion","submitted_at":"2024-05-30T09:28:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"In-context learning (ICL) allows LLMs to learn from examples without changing their weights: this is a particularly promising capability for long-context LLMs that can potentially learn from many examples. Recently, Lin et al. (2024) proposed URIAL, a method using only three in-context examples to align base LLMs, achieving non-trivial instruction following performance. In this work, we show that, while effective, ICL alignment with URIAL still underperforms compared to instruction fine-tuning on the established benchmark MT-Bench, especially with more capable base LLMs. We then uncover the mo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.19874","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-05-30T09:28:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"ee26869dd3afbf2e2c26559a003530644f1a663660034654a1be7de0323bae7e","abstract_canon_sha256":"049eb5d7bd105d94a0d73920edf490d30709d45a217db78c5b98046a59d2d00b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270862Z","signature_b64":"aJjlq9lolfM/CshI14aAF1MQ44MLxuujDpT6Ttv4QBuPVBgM+5MUrRig98PelqyiPHSJrs/N1mRCQGmu2KPECA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fc73139cfc5abefd55e79d139d89fef0b02fe26dbeeac4c34ad1621490dc55d0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270394Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270394Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is In-Context Learning Sufficient for Instruction Following in LLMs?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Francesco Croce, Hao Zhao, Maksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas Flammarion","submitted_at":"2024-05-30T09:28:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"In-context learning (ICL) allows LLMs to learn from examples without changing their weights: this is a particularly promising capability for long-context LLMs that can potentially learn from many examples. Recently, Lin et al. (2024) proposed URIAL, a method using only three in-context examples to align base LLMs, achieving non-trivial instruction following performance. In this work, we show that, while effective, ICL alignment with URIAL still underperforms compared to instruction fine-tuning on the established benchmark MT-Bench, especially with more capable base LLMs. We then uncover the mo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.19874","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.19874/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.19874","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.19874v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.19874","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7RZRHHH4LK7P","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7RZRHHH4","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29407","citing_title":"LC-ICL: Label-Guided Contrastive In-Context Learning for Robust Information Extraction","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RZRHHH4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7RZRHHH4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.19874&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7RZRHHH4LK7P2VPHTUJZ3CP66C/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:50:42.270447+00:00"}