{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS","short_pith_number":"pith:7V3QVA2T","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fd770a8353dbe42ab36591f9a18a1034a30574fce38f55f12d9102946f44fe3b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.07504","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Using LLMs to Discover Legal Factors","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jaromir Savelka, Kevin Ashley, Morgan Gray, Wesley Oliver","submitted_at":"2024-10-10T00:42:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Factors are a foundational component of legal analysis and computational models of legal reasoning. These factor-based representations enable lawyers, judges, and AI and Law researchers to reason about legal cases. In this paper, we introduce a methodology that leverages large language models (LLMs) to discover lists of factors that effectively represent a legal domain. Our method takes as input raw court opinions and produces a set of factors and associated definitions. We demonstrate that a semi-automated approach, incorporating minimal human involvement, produces factor representations that"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.07504","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-10T00:42:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"e743d9501167804f97e3ad65b1d5f6548cb7f92aee957f47e4585e6e23e6a1bc","abstract_canon_sha256":"8f2538754f71b0652c142bfcd2d2a36e5174f776aa09a494ab757de6773f7876"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.480422Z","signature_b64":"plHTsaQoUqzW4I3qbOokqyqaKPTox/DC5jg8AooXhVYsXwe8iwFNHFMVUb8a5wrP2Y0LNyTTBOUYLEqHgf1kDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fd770a8353dbe42ab36591f9a18a1034a30574fce38f55f12d9102946f44fe3b","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479930Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479930Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Using LLMs to Discover Legal Factors","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jaromir Savelka, Kevin Ashley, Morgan Gray, Wesley Oliver","submitted_at":"2024-10-10T00:42:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Factors are a foundational component of legal analysis and computational models of legal reasoning. These factor-based representations enable lawyers, judges, and AI and Law researchers to reason about legal cases. In this paper, we introduce a methodology that leverages large language models (LLMs) to discover lists of factors that effectively represent a legal domain. Our method takes as input raw court opinions and produces a set of factors and associated definitions. We demonstrate that a semi-automated approach, incorporating minimal human involvement, produces factor representations that"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.07504","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.07504/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.07504","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.07504v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.07504","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7V3QVA2T3PSC","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3F","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7V3QVA2T","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16767","citing_title":"Retrieval-Based Multi-Label Legal Annotation: Extensible, Data-Efficient and Hallucination-Free","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13412","citing_title":"LLMs as annotators of credibility assessment in Danish asylum decisions: evaluating classification performance and errors beyond aggregated metrics","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7V3QVA2T"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7V3QVA2T","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.07504&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7V3QVA2T3PSCVM3FSH42DCQQGS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:38.479992+00:00"}