{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N","short_pith_number":"pith:7VLRXYZV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fd571be3350ff31edb911d86c7af3eeb782c77a4de4936757a00f7a3cb2646d2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.11553","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Susceptibility Paradox in Online Social Influence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Emilio Ferrara, Jinyi Ye, Julie Jiang, Luca Luceri","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T13:52:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding susceptibility to online influence is crucial for mitigating the spread of misinformation and protecting vulnerable audiences. This paper investigates susceptibility to influence within social networks, focusing on the differential effects of influence-driven versus spontaneous behaviors on user content adoption. Our analysis reveals that influence-driven adoption exhibits high homophily, indicating that individuals prone to influence often connect with similarly susceptible peers, thereby reinforcing peer influence dynamics, whereas spontaneous adoption shows significant but low"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.11553","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T13:52:50Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"fb2e8e55b386990e03b4999eb98b979e1e5383420ed94013dbd67704066ad23d","abstract_canon_sha256":"d8cd0ee1d1473ab9c61afb5ffe42ab7327e0583cf0a97a9577feb93de016a8a3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.911101Z","signature_b64":"gKPWZ4Ah4znfiBDPLzhNPJSa5PdssuliRgb3L8kHnDZff8cIkf8/JYiXSzT4Ji1wkjWL8r9tIr0OpPXBSH+rCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fd571be3350ff31edb911d86c7af3eeb782c77a4de4936757a00f7a3cb2646d2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910598Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910598Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Susceptibility Paradox in Online Social Influence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Emilio Ferrara, Jinyi Ye, Julie Jiang, Luca Luceri","submitted_at":"2024-06-17T13:52:50Z","abstract_excerpt":"Understanding susceptibility to online influence is crucial for mitigating the spread of misinformation and protecting vulnerable audiences. This paper investigates susceptibility to influence within social networks, focusing on the differential effects of influence-driven versus spontaneous behaviors on user content adoption. Our analysis reveals that influence-driven adoption exhibits high homophily, indicating that individuals prone to influence often connect with similarly susceptible peers, thereby reinforcing peer influence dynamics, whereas spontaneous adoption shows significant but low"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.11553","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.11553/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.11553","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.11553v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.11553","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7VLRXYZVB7ZR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4R","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7VLRXYZV","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.21729","citing_title":"Bridging the Narrative Divide: Cross-Platform Discourse Networks in Fragmented Ecosystems","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7VLRXYZV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7VLRXYZV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.11553&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7VLRXYZVB7ZR5W4RDWDMPLZ65N/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:02:38.910668+00:00"}