{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ","short_pith_number":"pith:7W7IPX3G","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fdbe87df66a806b2b652c6c9dbd3725e702c146829441939c1d539e1398c5e5a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.20708","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.NA","math.NA","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"David Eriksson, Eytan Bakshy, Maximilian Balandat, Samuel Daulton, Sebastian Ament","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T17:59:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Expected Improvement (EI) is arguably the most popular acquisition function in Bayesian optimization and has found countless successful applications, but its performance is often exceeded by that of more recent methods. Notably, EI and its variants, including for the parallel and multi-objective settings, are challenging to optimize because their acquisition values vanish numerically in many regions. This difficulty generally increases as the number of observations, dimensionality of the search space, or the number of constraints grow, resulting in performance that is inconsistent across the l"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.20708","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T17:59:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.NA","math.NA","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"a1fad97c4f4ecec62e2895a49081452a6d28b378303f32fe99a806b52cf4fe0a","abstract_canon_sha256":"c9cabeec0634979d96d0519054b82fdd7bb0c89c21b789d8a61d37d10d45f788"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331951Z","signature_b64":"1IXrbzTsEJ5vWujaomFihxk1+qTsq+HOqgEG2ebntJKOEbu10EIeamARa23Up1nAkNUfBfj9NgUjeVYH9QreCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fdbe87df66a806b2b652c6c9dbd3725e702c146829441939c1d539e1398c5e5a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331432Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331432Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.NA","math.NA","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"David Eriksson, Eytan Bakshy, Maximilian Balandat, Samuel Daulton, Sebastian Ament","submitted_at":"2023-10-31T17:59:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Expected Improvement (EI) is arguably the most popular acquisition function in Bayesian optimization and has found countless successful applications, but its performance is often exceeded by that of more recent methods. Notably, EI and its variants, including for the parallel and multi-objective settings, are challenging to optimize because their acquisition values vanish numerically in many regions. This difficulty generally increases as the number of observations, dimensionality of the search space, or the number of constraints grow, resulting in performance that is inconsistent across the l"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.20708","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.20708/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.20708","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.20708v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.20708","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7W7IPX3GVADL","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7W7IPX3GVADLFNSS","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7W7IPX3G","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23224","citing_title":"Multi-objective Bayesian optimisation of a double-layer target for quasi-monoenergetic TNSA protons","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00865","citing_title":"Constrained Bayesian Optimisation with Multiple Information Sources","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.03943","citing_title":"Multi-Variable Batch Bayesian Optimization in Materials Research: Synthetic Data Analysis of Noise Sensitivity and Problem Landscape Effects","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20125","citing_title":"Autonomous operation of the DIAG0 diagnostic line for 6D phase-space monitoring at LCLS-II","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07379","citing_title":"Quasicrystal Architected Nanomechanical Resonators via Data-Driven Design","ref_index":64,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7W7IPX3G"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7W7IPX3G","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.20708&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7W7IPX3GVADLFNSSY3E5XU3SLZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:57:38.331494+00:00"}