{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH","short_pith_number":"pith:7WSUN5PA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fda546f5e04390ad1d23f50e147ce021ffc5333431c1221978e28dbf5f42b101","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1707.04476","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Collaborative Nested Sampling: Big Data vs. complex physical models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Johannes Buchner","submitted_at":"2017-07-14T12:07:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The data torrent unleashed by current and upcoming astronomical surveys demands scalable analysis methods. Many machine learning approaches scale well, but separating the instrument measurement from the physical effects of interest, dealing with variable errors, and deriving parameter uncertainties is often an after-thought. Classic forward-folding analyses with Markov Chain Monte Carlo or Nested Sampling enable parameter estimation and model comparison, even for complex and slow-to-evaluate physical models. However, these approaches require independent runs for each data set, implying an unfe"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1707.04476","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.CO","submitted_at":"2017-07-14T12:07:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.IM","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"410263149c541ca200630f1cd018cb1088d8b094750f57e2189e75a03a9b6969","abstract_canon_sha256":"602ed691c708a1935b7be5a1b697a1e0220a48de2d3f0cb91318f0bd86da5e88"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.488255Z","signature_b64":"Gyqh1WRQmNx1tf0nXjQ7BfZpIEtA+FSac7YxP1ZcZIiKGLTOfxNFQTKVW4sdlBtC78PHBTyrY7WL2JXUs2FLCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fda546f5e04390ad1d23f50e147ce021ffc5333431c1221978e28dbf5f42b101","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487804Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487804Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Collaborative Nested Sampling: Big Data vs. complex physical models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM","physics.data-an","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Johannes Buchner","submitted_at":"2017-07-14T12:07:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"The data torrent unleashed by current and upcoming astronomical surveys demands scalable analysis methods. Many machine learning approaches scale well, but separating the instrument measurement from the physical effects of interest, dealing with variable errors, and deriving parameter uncertainties is often an after-thought. Classic forward-folding analyses with Markov Chain Monte Carlo or Nested Sampling enable parameter estimation and model comparison, even for complex and slow-to-evaluate physical models. However, these approaches require independent runs for each data set, implying an unfe"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1707.04476","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1707.04476/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1707.04476","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1707.04476v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.04476","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7WSUN5PAIOIK","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7WSUN5PA","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27520","citing_title":"The Ellis and Baldwin test of the Cosmic Dipole: Exploring the impact of multiple flux density cuts","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.16913","citing_title":"A linear PDF model for Bayesian inference","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.07236","citing_title":"Counting voids and filaments: Betti Curves as a Powerful Probe for Cosmology","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1904.02180","citing_title":"dynesty: A Dynamic Nested Sampling Package for Estimating Bayesian Posteriors and Evidences","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7WSUN5PA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7WSUN5PA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1707.04476&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7WSUN5PAIOIK2HJD6UHBI7HAEH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:01:53.487861+00:00"}