{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2008:7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2","short_pith_number":"pith:7X2W6T5R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fdf56f4fb13b0de2269669ff29793db69c9a34d5da031701562e51f4d79d4962","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"0803.4058","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Crime and punishment in scientific research","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Mathieu Bouville","submitted_at":"2008-03-28T08:11:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Typical arguments against scientific misconduct generally fail to support current policies on research fraud: they may not prove wrong what is usually considered research misconduct and they tend to make wrong things that are not normally seen as scientific fraud, in particular honest errors. I also point out that sanctions are not consistent with the reasons why scientific fraud is supposed to be wrong either. Moreover honestly seeking truth should not be contrived as a moral rule -- it is instead a necessary condition for work to qualify as scientific.\n  Keywords: cheating; ethics; fabricati"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"0803.4058","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2008-03-28T08:11:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"31b40175b88286c1ced062d830da4f672ca28a05c5e35e278107ccce3be6285d","abstract_canon_sha256":"de2248730d487c43b6e15cc2271e4d9e6a34b4eae0d33964b345dce3aa875b11"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000459Z","signature_b64":"fvlEOe8AJxCHA1hmhgLNVY4eSuIulxZ910JckfhIJm+C5ZbDeKSBTkOpEeP6Z3aCE+0daZTG9uAVDSaCdmgVCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fdf56f4fb13b0de2269669ff29793db69c9a34d5da031701562e51f4d79d4962","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000056Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000056Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Crime and punishment in scientific research","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","authors_text":"Mathieu Bouville","submitted_at":"2008-03-28T08:11:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Typical arguments against scientific misconduct generally fail to support current policies on research fraud: they may not prove wrong what is usually considered research misconduct and they tend to make wrong things that are not normally seen as scientific fraud, in particular honest errors. I also point out that sanctions are not consistent with the reasons why scientific fraud is supposed to be wrong either. Moreover honestly seeking truth should not be contrived as a moral rule -- it is instead a necessary condition for work to qualify as scientific.\n  Keywords: cheating; ethics; fabricati"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"0803.4058","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/0803.4058/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"0803.4058","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"0803.4058v3","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.0803.4058","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7X2W6T5RHMG6","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUW","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7X2W6T5R","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29012","citing_title":"The Game Changer Problem: Controlling Equilibria with Discrete Rewards","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7X2W6T5R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7X2W6T5R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=0803.4058&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7X2W6T5RHMG6EJUWNH7SS6J5W2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:14:21.000121+00:00"}