{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3","short_pith_number":"pith:7YE5IXCJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fe09d45c49bf86e8c9081a60de6da07ee37232ff7ded0efd37805e3f79ce04b5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1804.05419","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Spacetimes as topological spaces, and the need to take methods of general topology more seriously","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.MP"],"primary_cat":"math-ph","authors_text":"Fabio Scardigli, Kyriakos Papadopoulos","submitted_at":"2018-04-15T20:11:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Why is the manifold topology in a spacetime taken for granted? Why do we prefer to use Riemann open balls as basic-open sets, while there also exists a Lorentz metric? Which topology is a best candidate for a spacetime; a topology sufficient for the description of spacetime singularities or a topology which incorporates the causal structure? Or both? Is it more preferable to have a topology with as many physical properties as possible, whose description might be complicated and counterintuitive, or a topology which can be described via a countable basis but misses some important information? T"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1804.05419","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math-ph","submitted_at":"2018-04-15T20:11:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.MP"],"title_canon_sha256":"6836faca6efc312dea02ef4ed5b90d6acbc84b9e1bcc3daa1580e3121ba6d491","abstract_canon_sha256":"c777fbdc71c98a167b1dabb031110faeba285d2bf734c235645ea8214ddbe4b5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.950224Z","signature_b64":"+mx1A/MH7qKYLO6yWGU4mdtNrJdLoAJAWCa/1wimAEefQudyO3TcLuE+M1MA/ukvVd91vRgUk1hm3HvYMUu5CA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fe09d45c49bf86e8c9081a60de6da07ee37232ff7ded0efd37805e3f79ce04b5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949539Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949539Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Spacetimes as topological spaces, and the need to take methods of general topology more seriously","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.MP"],"primary_cat":"math-ph","authors_text":"Fabio Scardigli, Kyriakos Papadopoulos","submitted_at":"2018-04-15T20:11:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Why is the manifold topology in a spacetime taken for granted? Why do we prefer to use Riemann open balls as basic-open sets, while there also exists a Lorentz metric? Which topology is a best candidate for a spacetime; a topology sufficient for the description of spacetime singularities or a topology which incorporates the causal structure? Or both? Is it more preferable to have a topology with as many physical properties as possible, whose description might be complicated and counterintuitive, or a topology which can be described via a countable basis but misses some important information? T"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1804.05419","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1804.05419/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1804.05419","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1804.05419v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1804.05419","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7YE5IXCJX6DO","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7YE5IXCJX6DORSII","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7YE5IXCJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.14062","citing_title":"Nontrivial constitutive laws and unified structures in constrained BF theory","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7YE5IXCJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7YE5IXCJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1804.05419&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7YE5IXCJX6DORSIIDJQN43NAP3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:04:36.949787+00:00"}