{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI","short_pith_number":"pith:7Z7IUIMN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fe7e8a218d8d9d3e42feffdf3c476e6a28188104856905bada61f1dbdcb6684b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2205.10869","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Planck NPIPE maps confirm 2018 cosmology with roughly 10 percent tighter constraints on parameters.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Erik Rosenberg, George Efstathiou, Steven Gratton","submitted_at":"2022-05-22T17:02:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present angular power spectra and cosmological parameter constraints derived from the Planck PR4 (NPIPE) maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background. NPIPE, released by the Planck Collaboration in 2020, is a new processing pipeline for producing calibrated frequency maps from Planck data. We have created new versions of the CamSpec likelihood using these maps and applied them to constrain LCDM and single-parameter extensions. We find excellent consistency between NPIPE and the Planck 2018 maps at the parameter level, showing that the Planck cosmology is robust to substantial changes in the mapm"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2205.10869","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2022-05-22T17:02:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"64d7efab20c085938bbd979dd5f50184f87f6f3ed36bc43fbf4305d38568e439","abstract_canon_sha256":"44c534d859bbfc13b32a29ae5d5b5e244c7bd1f3b918fe8f7e05c68c1f59d434"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980858Z","signature_b64":"GLlZDE3+5uecqUS4lYMFoLNfa26AdOqpmF2TkHoDtB99IdSJSrdWvKBrH/GpBFc2oxQltMvS7u03DY8sLt7aDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fe7e8a218d8d9d3e42feffdf3c476e6a28188104856905bada61f1dbdcb6684b","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980399Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980399Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"Planck NPIPE maps confirm 2018 cosmology with roughly 10 percent tighter constraints on parameters.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Erik Rosenberg, George Efstathiou, Steven Gratton","submitted_at":"2022-05-22T17:02:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present angular power spectra and cosmological parameter constraints derived from the Planck PR4 (NPIPE) maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background. NPIPE, released by the Planck Collaboration in 2020, is a new processing pipeline for producing calibrated frequency maps from Planck data. We have created new versions of the CamSpec likelihood using these maps and applied them to constrain LCDM and single-parameter extensions. We find excellent consistency between NPIPE and the Planck 2018 maps at the parameter level, showing that the Planck cosmology is robust to substantial changes in the mapm"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"We find excellent consistency between NPIPE and the Planck 2018 maps at the parameter level, showing that the Planck cosmology is robust to substantial changes in the mapmaking. The lower noise of NPIPE leads to ~10% tighter constraints, and we see both smaller error bars and a shift toward the LCDM values for beyond-LCDM parameters including Omega_K and A_Lens.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the NPIPE mapmaking pipeline and the CamSpec likelihood together capture the true cosmological signal without introducing new unmodeled systematics that could bias the parameter shifts or error-bar reductions.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Planck PR4 NPIPE maps processed with CamSpec produce LCDM parameters consistent with 2018 results but with ~10% tighter constraints and shifts toward LCDM values for extensions like Omega_K and A_Lens.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Planck NPIPE maps confirm 2018 cosmology with roughly 10 percent tighter constraints on parameters.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"4f0bab61a3854e727f4162e0320b55ab6fb1bff01550f02e135248b56d1e39fe"},"source":{"id":"2205.10869","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"af2bae99-db39-4c57-a361-04e02e4e5b61","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-16T18:23:52.105566Z","strongest_claim":"We find excellent consistency between NPIPE and the Planck 2018 maps at the parameter level, showing that the Planck cosmology is robust to substantial changes in the mapmaking. The lower noise of NPIPE leads to ~10% tighter constraints, and we see both smaller error bars and a shift toward the LCDM values for beyond-LCDM parameters including Omega_K and A_Lens.","one_line_summary":"Planck PR4 NPIPE maps processed with CamSpec produce LCDM parameters consistent with 2018 results but with ~10% tighter constraints and shifts toward LCDM values for extensions like Omega_K and A_Lens.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the NPIPE mapmaking pipeline and the CamSpec likelihood together capture the true cosmological signal without introducing new unmodeled systematics that could bias the parameter shifts or error-bar reductions.","pith_extraction_headline":"Planck NPIPE maps confirm 2018 cosmology with roughly 10 percent tighter constraints on parameters."},"references":{"count":300,"sample":[{"doi":"10.1086/309179","year":2000,"title":"Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models","work_id":"366015e5-cd86-4996-8a5e-81ec18d1971c","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"astro-ph/9911177","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/04/027","year":2012,"title":"CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology","work_id":"2ca651b5-07b7-4613-971d-9fc6973885c2","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"1201.3654","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/201936386","year":2018,"title":"Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods","work_id":"b5433e4f-7783-4472-a549-bdc3a40bb515","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"1907.12875","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"arXiv e-prints , keywords =","work_id":"8ea98dd1-8de1-421d-9fb3-8cbee2b86803","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1103/physrevd.66.103511","year":2002,"title":"Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach","work_id":"adc2a248-a7ae-4c99-971e-610982aa9c6e","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"astro-ph/0205436","is_internal_anchor":true}],"resolved_work":300,"snapshot_sha256":"588446dead9dd8e04f46a479c7a6ca98413006ca8f4542e5e4136059fc7ebbf4","internal_anchors":14},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"snapshot_sha256":"08e973043f5762de7890a8658287214879a1f8de812b423cf99d468d0f3edf75"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2205.10869","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980478+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2205.10869v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980478+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2205.10869","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980478+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7Z7IUIMNRWOT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:33.725879+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:33.725879+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7Z7IUIMN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:33.725879+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":24,"internal_anchor_count":24,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.22309","citing_title":"Signatures of Modified Gravity Below $\\mathcal{O}(10)$ Mpc in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21456","citing_title":"Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy?","ref_index":163,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.13537","citing_title":"Revisiting $\\Lambda$CDM extensions in light of re-analyzed CMB data","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09981","citing_title":"New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa","ref_index":75,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.01759","citing_title":"Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.10439","citing_title":"Constraints of dynamical dark energy models from different observational datasets","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2206.07773","citing_title":"CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14744","citing_title":"Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape","ref_index":125,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.03110","citing_title":"Evidence for deviation in gravitational light deflection from general relativity at cosmological scales with KiDS-Legacy and CMB lensing","ref_index":138,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.12347","citing_title":"Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Smooth Transitions with Recent DESI DR2 Observations","ref_index":125,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.12022","citing_title":"DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements","ref_index":90,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.26560","citing_title":"Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14743","citing_title":"Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements","ref_index":78,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.02204","citing_title":"Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction","ref_index":77,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03756","citing_title":"Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?","ref_index":96,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12415","citing_title":"Late-time reconstruction of non-minimally coupled gravity with a smoothness prior","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11079","citing_title":"New Isocurvature Constraints from JWST UV Luminosity Function","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2404.03002","citing_title":"DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations","ref_index":165,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24761","citing_title":"Cosmological Impact of Redshift-Dependent Type Ia Supernovae Calibration","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23492","citing_title":"The open-Universe signal: A model artifact rather than genuine curvature","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19198","citing_title":"Cosmological constraints on TeV-scale dark matter subcomponents decaying between recombination and reionisation","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13535","citing_title":"Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension","ref_index":165,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13423","citing_title":"Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14738","citing_title":"DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints","ref_index":110,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7Z7IUIMN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7Z7IUIMN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2205.10869&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7Z7IUIMNRWOT4QX677PTYR3ONI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980478+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:38:46.980478+00:00"}