{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK","short_pith_number":"pith:7ZOYWGNU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"fe5d8b19b40166426d697a0d385cb72a952469e813cc16b6d555c5ee8d416df3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.23108","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Philosophical Dispositions as Behavioral Constraints for AI-Assisted Code Review: An Empirical Study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Kaushal Bansal","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T23:57:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"AI-assisted code review tools typically operate as generic \"expert reviewer\" agents, producing homogeneous findings regardless of the analysis type needed. We present a system that constrains AI reviewer behavior through philosophical dispositions -- coherent personality lenses grounded in specific epistemological traditions (Pyrrhonist Skepticism, Navya-Ny=aya logic, Diogenes' Cynicism, Confucian relational ethics) that direct attention to structurally different types of issues. Each disposition is defined apophatically (by what it refuses to do), equipped with a self-monitoring failure mode "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.23108","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T23:57:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"3eb73d604fe5f3cf3eeac221cb84158dddbea812648d4e1f7cab7e6f91cd162f","abstract_canon_sha256":"31604615dd4fb16ce1842164ee3531be4f33ac4c257150b540c256bccea24cf6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.854362Z","signature_b64":"x1YBcng5q2QYRe1hO/iHQJRpkcCKcIH0wm5/JySS3Ju9QINEUpcLThjYtsDmYD3vRDFR8AT8HITZyWOBUXlWCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"fe5d8b19b40166426d697a0d385cb72a952469e813cc16b6d555c5ee8d416df3","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853890Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853890Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Philosophical Dispositions as Behavioral Constraints for AI-Assisted Code Review: An Empirical Study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Kaushal Bansal","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T23:57:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"AI-assisted code review tools typically operate as generic \"expert reviewer\" agents, producing homogeneous findings regardless of the analysis type needed. We present a system that constrains AI reviewer behavior through philosophical dispositions -- coherent personality lenses grounded in specific epistemological traditions (Pyrrhonist Skepticism, Navya-Ny=aya logic, Diogenes' Cynicism, Confucian relational ethics) that direct attention to structurally different types of issues. Each disposition is defined apophatically (by what it refuses to do), equipped with a self-monitoring failure mode "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2605.23108","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.23108/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.23108","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.23108v1","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.23108","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"7ZOYWGNUAFTE","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJ","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"7ZOYWGNU","created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7ZOYWGNU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/7ZOYWGNU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.23108&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/7ZOYWGNUAFTEE3LJPIGTQXFXFK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-25T02:01:38.853966+00:00"}