{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V","short_pith_number":"pith:A2ZRZRNC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"06b31cc5a252be6c92acc022b0fc7ced7f0a87e491031236209356258cc4192d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1307.4101","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Decision Making for Inconsistent Expert Judgments Using Negative Probabilities","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","math.ST","quant-ph","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.OT","authors_text":"J. Acacio de Barros","submitted_at":"2013-07-15T20:53:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we provide a simple random-variable example of inconsistent information, and analyze it using three different approaches: Bayesian, quantum-like, and negative probabilities. We then show that, at least for this particular example, both the Bayesian and the quantum-like approaches have less normative power than the negative probabilities one."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1307.4101","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.OT","submitted_at":"2013-07-15T20:53:57Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","math.ST","quant-ph","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"3a06eebe79d71c6bb84c5e5133e5e192bdf6ca0b305fb4fe10ad693062b99362","abstract_canon_sha256":"beb1b59d30d6005a7ce8aac8c6840b90b2a6127d381afa24d9f00c430e401c86"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.400602Z","signature_b64":"z8EMZtLEpKL3sfVip/kk+38c6cVCzFS2DdTi7l49+DKp2591qXFrhC3irAb7cFzgEFfWjSqZMgZQ2vQHVnk4AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"06b31cc5a252be6c92acc022b0fc7ced7f0a87e491031236209356258cc4192d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399746Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399746Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Decision Making for Inconsistent Expert Judgments Using Negative Probabilities","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","math.ST","quant-ph","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.OT","authors_text":"J. Acacio de Barros","submitted_at":"2013-07-15T20:53:57Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we provide a simple random-variable example of inconsistent information, and analyze it using three different approaches: Bayesian, quantum-like, and negative probabilities. We then show that, at least for this particular example, both the Bayesian and the quantum-like approaches have less normative power than the negative probabilities one."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1307.4101","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1307.4101","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1307.4101v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1307.4101","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399887+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"A2ZRZRNCKK7G","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:38.830355+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:38.830355+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"A2ZRZRNC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:38.830355+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V","json":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A2ZRZRNC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A2ZRZRNC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1307.4101&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/A2ZRZRNCKK7GZEVMYARLB7D45V/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399887+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:12:11.399887+00:00"}