{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS","short_pith_number":"pith:A37PPIUY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"06fef7a298324687488fa7b2384d753cae9e3202c5950dcb93766fb90ab89af5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2105.02987","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do language models learn typicality judgments from text?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Allyson Ettinger, Julia Taylor Rayz, Kanishka Misra","submitted_at":"2021-05-06T21:56:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Building on research arguing for the possibility of conceptual and categorical knowledge acquisition through statistics contained in language, we evaluate predictive language models (LMs) -- informed solely by textual input -- on a prevalent phenomenon in cognitive science: typicality. Inspired by experiments that involve language processing and show robust typicality effects in humans, we propose two tests for LMs. Our first test targets whether typicality modulates LM probabilities in assigning taxonomic category memberships to items. The second test investigates sensitivities to typicality "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2105.02987","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-05-06T21:56:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bb77c8149a06d43452938170359adc2254be3a21251bacade251b830f2b6fc23","abstract_canon_sha256":"d74cd35e3c9bfd221f4d23931596da1b2d3adfda531f7412783b017f57e33c53"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.231264Z","signature_b64":"VEx3DYZNEi5oK8fkgHQUPgAzy5waooIAT/hd7EKN2mgynVjEOBrHyktGf5V+hq3V2aFmzWcUJvqcXaeormZMDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"06fef7a298324687488fa7b2384d753cae9e3202c5950dcb93766fb90ab89af5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230857Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230857Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do language models learn typicality judgments from text?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Allyson Ettinger, Julia Taylor Rayz, Kanishka Misra","submitted_at":"2021-05-06T21:56:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Building on research arguing for the possibility of conceptual and categorical knowledge acquisition through statistics contained in language, we evaluate predictive language models (LMs) -- informed solely by textual input -- on a prevalent phenomenon in cognitive science: typicality. Inspired by experiments that involve language processing and show robust typicality effects in humans, we propose two tests for LMs. Our first test targets whether typicality modulates LM probabilities in assigning taxonomic category memberships to items. The second test investigates sensitivities to typicality "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2105.02987","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2105.02987/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2105.02987","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2105.02987v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2105.02987","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"A37PPIUYGJDI","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"A37PPIUYGJDIOSEP","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"A37PPIUY","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.12651","citing_title":"The potential -- and the pitfalls -- of using pre-trained language models as cognitive science theories","ref_index":63,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A37PPIUY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A37PPIUY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2105.02987&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/A37PPIUYGJDIOSEPU6ZDQTLVHS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:38:20.230920+00:00"}