{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH","short_pith_number":"pith:A3ELEKTP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"06c8b22a6f0b7411ec58cd49c11bbec9c4cc22c15335bb2025955714251c323d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.18768","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ao Chang, Delai Qiu, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu, Shengping Liu, Tong Zhou, Yubo Chen","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) aims to predict judicial outcomes, including relevant legal charge, terms, and fines, which is a crucial process in Large Language Model(LLM). However, LJP faces two key challenges: (1)Long Tail Distribution: Current datasets, derived from authentic cases, suffer from high human annotation costs and imbalanced distributions, leading to model performance degradation. (2)Lawyer's Improvement: Existing systems focus on enhancing judges' decision-making but neglect the critical role of lawyers in refining arguments, which limits overall judicial accuracy. To address"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.18768","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b11538922e17996635d0e8b7891a0267b196068e4f72ef7ecfdb902d83e6f6ed","abstract_canon_sha256":"23b24afd2958473bfd3d879dec151b044bd3f69e29f651eeb35652dc666f7782"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710863Z","signature_b64":"NEOA0zG6StKrBwnIN7SAi5jyZqyQe17UiByjxO4Kx9yIlCVGfaMUAZJkWhVxToVbdyDAe4OaYDs3L9wNGVcQBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"06c8b22a6f0b7411ec58cd49c11bbec9c4cc22c15335bb2025955714251c323d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710340Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710340Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Ao Chang, Delai Qiu, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu, Shengping Liu, Tong Zhou, Yubo Chen","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) aims to predict judicial outcomes, including relevant legal charge, terms, and fines, which is a crucial process in Large Language Model(LLM). However, LJP faces two key challenges: (1)Long Tail Distribution: Current datasets, derived from authentic cases, suffer from high human annotation costs and imbalanced distributions, leading to model performance degradation. (2)Lawyer's Improvement: Existing systems focus on enhancing judges' decision-making but neglect the critical role of lawyers in refining arguments, which limits overall judicial accuracy. To address"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.18768","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.18768/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.18768","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.18768v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.18768","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"A3ELEKTPBN2B","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"A3ELEKTP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.01559","citing_title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A3ELEKTP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A3ELEKTP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.18768&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/A3ELEKTPBN2BD3CYZVE4CG56ZH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:25:55.710414+00:00"}