{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC","short_pith_number":"pith:A65U6NBF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"07bb4f3425828ab5bd7249b8e3d43338815ef1f52a5d34f7939cfd7fc294c397","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.02822","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Which Defense Closes Which Threat? Attributing OWASP-LLM-Top-10 Coverage and Its Brittleness Under Paraphrasing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Alexandre Cristov\\~ao Maiorano","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T19:39:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Production LLM applications stack several defense families -- refusal-phrase filters, token-budget controls, model allowlists, rate limits, tool-registry authentication -- yet existing breach-and-attack-simulation (BAS) benchmarks report a single aggregate coverage number, hiding which family closes which threat. We measure attribution. We add four OWASP-LLM-Top-10-aware agents to a 21-agent baseline scanner and target a lattice of four synthetic LLM endpoints: $L_0$ (no defenses), $L_1$ (refusal-only), $L_2$ (budget-only), and $L_3$ (full stack). $L_1$ and $L_2$ are sibling single-axis ablati"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.02822","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T19:39:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"359be3e197e1af783c73c102e08a8b201384a861a1aa288b122edd99626b9f13","abstract_canon_sha256":"2d95bbcdd7fc19e3666bc0d27504e501775f1159f9e2d8837ba810c67e73ae05"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.894311Z","signature_b64":"oZVyJvpdzMTskDP4f73RO7jXmKvpZA+3qr6KTBLVm0k/kBKuxmsuKm1ZjmizNzYrJeyYEkvH5VsMn8NzMIlSDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"07bb4f3425828ab5bd7249b8e3d43338815ef1f52a5d34f7939cfd7fc294c397","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893941Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893941Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Which Defense Closes Which Threat? Attributing OWASP-LLM-Top-10 Coverage and Its Brittleness Under Paraphrasing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Alexandre Cristov\\~ao Maiorano","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T19:39:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Production LLM applications stack several defense families -- refusal-phrase filters, token-budget controls, model allowlists, rate limits, tool-registry authentication -- yet existing breach-and-attack-simulation (BAS) benchmarks report a single aggregate coverage number, hiding which family closes which threat. We measure attribution. We add four OWASP-LLM-Top-10-aware agents to a 21-agent baseline scanner and target a lattice of four synthetic LLM endpoints: $L_0$ (no defenses), $L_1$ (refusal-only), $L_2$ (budget-only), and $L_3$ (full stack). $L_1$ and $L_2$ are sibling single-axis ablati"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.02822","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.02822/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.02822","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.02822v1","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.02822","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"A65U6NBFQKFL","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"A65U6NBFQKFLLPLS","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"A65U6NBF","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A65U6NBF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A65U6NBF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.02822&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/A65U6NBFQKFLLPLSJG4OHVBTHC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:23.893997+00:00"}