{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3","short_pith_number":"pith:A6Z42HN2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"07b3cd1dba5e22561921ef7e97f23776f9e805c65eb19e50022df444b8f8cf11","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2002.10716","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracy","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Aditi Raghunathan, Fanny Yang, John Duchi, Percy Liang, Sang Michael Xie","submitted_at":"2020-02-25T08:03:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Adversarial training augments the training set with perturbations to improve the robust error (over worst-case perturbations), but it often leads to an increase in the standard error (on unperturbed test inputs). Previous explanations for this tradeoff rely on the assumption that no predictor in the hypothesis class has low standard and robust error. In this work, we precisely characterize the effect of augmentation on the standard error in linear regression when the optimal linear predictor has zero standard and robust error. In particular, we show that the standard error could increase even "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2002.10716","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-02-25T08:03:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"be1de4ba76b2d71ce553a71aa41290e0817c7c60aa49daf320f2430f09b3489f","abstract_canon_sha256":"31ba3bc3550f183d9c6cc8ae48ae3f326dd34976344195c8fdd5b49dc77dcdfa"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507490Z","signature_b64":"/u6Jxxh7vVuceMTRiUhj/TKQ/wC0W463W7P6mxgzX9E/2u4XtanVbkflZBxjZSeSuqLTup8sRr5knop3euCTCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"07b3cd1dba5e22561921ef7e97f23776f9e805c65eb19e50022df444b8f8cf11","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.506988Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.506988Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracy","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Aditi Raghunathan, Fanny Yang, John Duchi, Percy Liang, Sang Michael Xie","submitted_at":"2020-02-25T08:03:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Adversarial training augments the training set with perturbations to improve the robust error (over worst-case perturbations), but it often leads to an increase in the standard error (on unperturbed test inputs). Previous explanations for this tradeoff rely on the assumption that no predictor in the hypothesis class has low standard and robust error. In this work, we precisely characterize the effect of augmentation on the standard error in linear regression when the optimal linear predictor has zero standard and robust error. In particular, we show that the standard error could increase even "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2002.10716","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2002.10716/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2002.10716","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2002.10716v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2002.10716","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"A6Z42HN2LYRF","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"A6Z42HN2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00207","citing_title":"Homogenization of $\\ell_2$-Adversarial Training in High-Dimensions: Exact Dynamics under Stochastic Gradient Descent","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.03000","citing_title":"Towards Generalized Certified Robustness with Multi-Norm Training","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24044","citing_title":"CLLAP: Contrastive Learning-based LiDAR-Augmented Pretraining for Enhanced Radar-Camera Fusion","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15552","citing_title":"Feature-level analysis and adversarial transfer in rotationally equivariant quantum machine learning","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A6Z42HN2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A6Z42HN2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2002.10716&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/A6Z42HN2LYRFMGJB557JP4RXO3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:16:45.507080+00:00"}