{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT","short_pith_number":"pith:A7S2Z7S6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"07e5acfe5e1e1d2cd16ade103bd694acedecf494e9e6fb2f9f8f9633565c5fa6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1910.13547","version":8},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Persuasion with Coarse Communication","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Eray Turkel, Yunus C. Aybas","submitted_at":"2019-10-29T21:36:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"In many expert-decision maker settings, information is richer than the language used to convey it. Motivated by this communication friction, we study Bayesian persuasion when the sender is constrained to use $k$ messages. We show that the sender's value is given by a $k$-point analogue of concavification, which we call $k$-concavification. An optimal information structure can be chosen with affinely independent posterior support, allowing the problem to be reduced to a lower-dimensional persuasion problem and then solved by standard concavification. We derive a tight bound on the value of comm"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1910.13547","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.TH","submitted_at":"2019-10-29T21:36:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"aac904ee1e3566499dd8ca0bb340b83df0d7ac2189a4990da3bed3f5ae51b0e4","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7361ba1a535cb302aa9db798322733fff3f23a7a4ebb9d6c66ceeeb2b4957ee"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.603308Z","signature_b64":"2aOdkNzXL2IS6LYUpS4biTNU5CCfUZ4KhOHCZbTEM9hjg3ilu/87ZDRQOAXkGNlhZEaJGBoQHTFd62Ds3iapDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"07e5acfe5e1e1d2cd16ade103bd694acedecf494e9e6fb2f9f8f9633565c5fa6","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602811Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602811Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Persuasion with Coarse Communication","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"econ.TH","authors_text":"Eray Turkel, Yunus C. Aybas","submitted_at":"2019-10-29T21:36:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"In many expert-decision maker settings, information is richer than the language used to convey it. Motivated by this communication friction, we study Bayesian persuasion when the sender is constrained to use $k$ messages. We show that the sender's value is given by a $k$-point analogue of concavification, which we call $k$-concavification. An optimal information structure can be chosen with affinely independent posterior support, allowing the problem to be reduced to a lower-dimensional persuasion problem and then solved by standard concavification. We derive a tight bound on the value of comm"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1910.13547","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1910.13547/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1910.13547","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1910.13547v8","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1910.13547","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"A7S2Z7S6DYOS","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"A7S2Z7S6","created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.06321","citing_title":"On the Interplay of Privacy, Persuasion and Quantization","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A7S2Z7S6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/A7S2Z7S6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1910.13547&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/A7S2Z7S6DYOSZULK3YIDXVUUVT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-23T03:14:26.602878+00:00"}