{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT","short_pith_number":"pith:AAXHJQK5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"002e74c15d075cb556a0fc72f45f28bcc799d0d715e1406c19247013a0c17cad","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.24671","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dayeon Ki, Marine Carpuat, Rachel Rudinger, Tianyi Zhou","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T15:01:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) need to adapt their predictions to diverse cultural contexts to benefit diverse communities across the world. While previous efforts have focused on single-LLM, single-turn approaches, we propose to exploit the complementary strengths of multiple LLMs to promote cultural adaptability. We introduce a Multi-Agent Debate framework, where two LLM-based agents debate over a cultural scenario and collaboratively reach a final decision. We propose two variants: one where either LLM agents exclusively debate and another where they dynamically choose between self-reflection"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.24671","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T15:01:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"43f2fc0fb65a9640abc92c9832f129c79b3bb91c7f00dd7c3a0fec79c8f9cbbb","abstract_canon_sha256":"64c5c76e6993b1bcbb684d5cae333ec426390475fb995e2fafcf52708fbe083a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.697092Z","signature_b64":"RVvMRcrp6n4dX1MXaUf1H3OJp6WoAqr9zs/8ePJ+D+Gu4b5m+86MDOGWszzfKzo3Fj/8zfYtp6fRdQzJ6edEAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"002e74c15d075cb556a0fc72f45f28bcc799d0d715e1406c19247013a0c17cad","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696596Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696596Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Dayeon Ki, Marine Carpuat, Rachel Rudinger, Tianyi Zhou","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T15:01:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) need to adapt their predictions to diverse cultural contexts to benefit diverse communities across the world. While previous efforts have focused on single-LLM, single-turn approaches, we propose to exploit the complementary strengths of multiple LLMs to promote cultural adaptability. We introduce a Multi-Agent Debate framework, where two LLM-based agents debate over a cultural scenario and collaboratively reach a final decision. We propose two variants: one where either LLM agents exclusively debate and another where they dynamically choose between self-reflection"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.24671","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.24671/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.24671","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.24671v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.24671","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AAXHJQK5A5OL","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AAXHJQK5","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12748","citing_title":"Agent-based models for the evolution of morphological alternation patterns","ref_index":224,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AAXHJQK5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AAXHJQK5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.24671&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AAXHJQK5A5OLKVVA7RZPIXZIXT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:02:46.696654+00:00"}