{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA","short_pith_number":"pith:ACPI5H5S","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"009e8e9fb200ea24dc82f1e3363237880c9ad989723cbff41f7fd733c8423f8e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1904.10988","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is Quantum Mechanics Self-Interpreting?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrea Oldofredi","submitted_at":"2019-04-24T18:03:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fuchs and Peres (2000) claimed that standard Quantum Mechanics needs no interpretation. In this essay, I show the flaws of the arguments presented in support to this thesis. Specifically, it will be claimed that the authors conflate QM with Quantum Bayesianism (QBism) - the most prominent subjective formulation of quantum theory; thus, they endorse a specific interpretation of the quantum formalism. Secondly, I will explain the main reasons for which QBism should not be considered a physical theory, being it concerned exclusively with agents' beliefs and silent about the physics of the quantum"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1904.10988","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2019-04-24T18:03:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"300ff668e695b99fea2258ecf7998c3b4b5de7a68f16566673a90a04f9a6c5c7","abstract_canon_sha256":"88d15abd136630cc18fc970f5618b27cba9045eba999d48a257a8bcadd156750"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948826Z","signature_b64":"aXx91xe5i8yAqYbbyxYzOZLk2d2WX1Elu+6e3kt9mYSDD55LTF1bH45/zv7+WIVt77wiq+VRMoVJtCJVFTw+CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"009e8e9fb200ea24dc82f1e3363237880c9ad989723cbff41f7fd733c8423f8e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948292Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948292Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is Quantum Mechanics Self-Interpreting?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrea Oldofredi","submitted_at":"2019-04-24T18:03:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Fuchs and Peres (2000) claimed that standard Quantum Mechanics needs no interpretation. In this essay, I show the flaws of the arguments presented in support to this thesis. Specifically, it will be claimed that the authors conflate QM with Quantum Bayesianism (QBism) - the most prominent subjective formulation of quantum theory; thus, they endorse a specific interpretation of the quantum formalism. Secondly, I will explain the main reasons for which QBism should not be considered a physical theory, being it concerned exclusively with agents' beliefs and silent about the physics of the quantum"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1904.10988","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1904.10988","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948398+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1904.10988v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948398+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1904.10988","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948398+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ACPI5H5SADVC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:12.712433+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:12.712433+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ACPI5H5S","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:12.712433+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ACPI5H5S"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ACPI5H5S","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1904.10988&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ACPI5H5SADVCJXEC6HRTMMRXRA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948398+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:47:47.948398+00:00"}