{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6","short_pith_number":"pith:ADB566ZA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"00c3df7b20242bba9dc96db6f09fea47a4ae119c5feec4cfe2e49fc8d0ff5da0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1907.09101","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When Do Introspection Axioms Matter for Multi-Agent Epistemic Reasoning?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Berkeley), Cedegao Zhang (University of California, Wesley H. Holliday (University of California, Yifeng Ding (University of California","submitted_at":"2019-07-22T03:14:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"The early literature on epistemic logic in philosophy focused on reasoning about the knowledge or belief of a single agent, especially on controversies about \"introspection axioms\" such as the 4 and 5 axioms. By contrast, the later literature on epistemic logic in computer science and game theory has focused on multi-agent epistemic reasoning, with the single-agent 4 and 5 axioms largely taken for granted. In the relevant multi-agent scenarios, it is often important to reason about what agent A believes about what agent B believes about what agent A believes; but it is rarely important to reas"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1907.09101","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2019-07-22T03:14:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.MA"],"title_canon_sha256":"0717eba1cfd9c4fc5290bdbc297b037eb266a5458f505e49aabea65db72f4656","abstract_canon_sha256":"1728913b6047abd40d5dd573bf1b8c441e00c90215b18d6afad77ceef83f69ef"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162664Z","signature_b64":"hArzDn4NGPvfJD7iiixDvC7tHfUs7rLOt8GWfswQJ1FBz2kWfsAym8+3b1jI4ILJcWhGOcYJHuDT7ppVwxjmCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"00c3df7b20242bba9dc96db6f09fea47a4ae119c5feec4cfe2e49fc8d0ff5da0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162040Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162040Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When Do Introspection Axioms Matter for Multi-Agent Epistemic Reasoning?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Berkeley), Cedegao Zhang (University of California, Wesley H. Holliday (University of California, Yifeng Ding (University of California","submitted_at":"2019-07-22T03:14:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"The early literature on epistemic logic in philosophy focused on reasoning about the knowledge or belief of a single agent, especially on controversies about \"introspection axioms\" such as the 4 and 5 axioms. By contrast, the later literature on epistemic logic in computer science and game theory has focused on multi-agent epistemic reasoning, with the single-agent 4 and 5 axioms largely taken for granted. In the relevant multi-agent scenarios, it is often important to reason about what agent A believes about what agent B believes about what agent A believes; but it is rarely important to reas"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1907.09101","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1907.09101","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1907.09101v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1907.09101","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162132+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ADB566ZAEQV3","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:12.712433+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:12.712433+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ADB566ZA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:12.712433+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ADB566ZA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ADB566ZA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1907.09101&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ADB566ZAEQV3VHOJNW3PBH7KI6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162132+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:40:00.162132+00:00"}