{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV","short_pith_number":"pith:AFWRNCUW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"016d168a967956e005094579e78ada7d63bc186b7f647094b1a2a2b687fcddc2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.11632","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CArtBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Chinese Art Understanding, Interpretation, and Authenticity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Vision-language models post high overall scores on Chinese art questions yet drop sharply on evidence linking, expert-style appreciation, and authenticity discrimination.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hidetaka Kamigaito, Hongyao Li, Taro Watanabe, Xuan Zhou, Xuefeng Wei, Yusuke Sakai, Zhi Qu, Zhixuan Wang","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T15:44:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce CARTBENCH, a museum-grounded benchmark for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) on Chinese artworks beyond short-form recognition and QA. CARTBENCH comprises four subtasks: CURATORQA for evidence-grounded recognition and reasoning, CATALOGCAPTION for structured four-section expert-style appreciation, REINTERPRET for defensible reinterpretation with expert ratings, and CONNOISSEURPAIRS for diagnostic authenticity discrimination under visually similar confounds. CARTBENCH is built by aligning image-bearing Palace Museum objects from Wikidata with authoritative catalog pages, spa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.11632","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T15:44:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e12777a36cd3a8ff00d38005462bec5c0d026ef11809c2b9c5064260459bdb27","abstract_canon_sha256":"8da9c408844116d6fb5ab29be49f9b1e05be9eb123eaaa0f2869994b4a94027d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334870Z","signature_b64":"6J35pa3IjQX+SraUXD8OBdxr7X91axXE94HrYp2KKEpGbYE/qUjUpcUYzax+9j83F/Upn6VDAKh1V2FYvONFCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"016d168a967956e005094579e78ada7d63bc186b7f647094b1a2a2b687fcddc2","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334005Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334005Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CArtBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Chinese Art Understanding, Interpretation, and Authenticity","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Vision-language models post high overall scores on Chinese art questions yet drop sharply on evidence linking, expert-style appreciation, and authenticity discrimination.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Hidetaka Kamigaito, Hongyao Li, Taro Watanabe, Xuan Zhou, Xuefeng Wei, Yusuke Sakai, Zhi Qu, Zhixuan Wang","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T15:44:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce CARTBENCH, a museum-grounded benchmark for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) on Chinese artworks beyond short-form recognition and QA. CARTBENCH comprises four subtasks: CURATORQA for evidence-grounded recognition and reasoning, CATALOGCAPTION for structured four-section expert-style appreciation, REINTERPRET for defensible reinterpretation with expert ratings, and CONNOISSEURPAIRS for diagnostic authenticity discrimination under visually similar confounds. CARTBENCH is built by aligning image-bearing Palace Museum objects from Wikidata with authoritative catalog pages, spa"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Across nine representative VLMs, we find that high overall CURATORQA accuracy can mask sharp drops on hard evidence linking and style-to-period inference; long-form appreciation remains far from expert references; and authenticity-oriented diagnostic discrimination stays near chance, underscoring the difficulty of connoisseur-level reasoning for current models.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That alignment of Wikidata objects with authoritative Palace Museum catalog pages and expert ratings provides reliable, unbiased ground truth for defensible reinterpretation and authenticity discrimination tasks.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"CArtBench shows VLMs achieve high scores on easy recognition but drop sharply on evidence linking, style inference, long-form appreciation, and authenticity discrimination for Chinese art.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Vision-language models post high overall scores on Chinese art questions yet drop sharply on evidence linking, expert-style appreciation, and authenticity discrimination.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"31818fdd737ccbab93bf4d159525226aeb1e00682e446a19039096f978d987cb"},"source":{"id":"2604.11632","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"dc9f2b65-79cc-4dd2-b49d-160fbc85f504","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T15:17:24.530599Z","strongest_claim":"Across nine representative VLMs, we find that high overall CURATORQA accuracy can mask sharp drops on hard evidence linking and style-to-period inference; long-form appreciation remains far from expert references; and authenticity-oriented diagnostic discrimination stays near chance, underscoring the difficulty of connoisseur-level reasoning for current models.","one_line_summary":"CArtBench shows VLMs achieve high scores on easy recognition but drop sharply on evidence linking, style inference, long-form appreciation, and authenticity discrimination for Chinese art.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That alignment of Wikidata objects with authoritative Palace Museum catalog pages and expert ratings provides reliable, unbiased ground truth for defensible reinterpretation and authenticity discrimination tasks.","pith_extraction_headline":"Vision-language models post high overall scores on Chinese art questions yet drop sharply on evidence linking, expert-style appreciation, and authenticity discrimination."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.11632/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.11632","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.11632v2","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.11632","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AFWRNCUWPFLO","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJ","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AFWRNCUW","created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AFWRNCUW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AFWRNCUW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.11632&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AFWRNCUWPFLOABIJIV46PCW2PV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-26T02:05:09.334119+00:00"}