{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723","short_pith_number":"pith:AGSAQVIP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"01a408550f90c48715e9aeb40604dfd6e8102bb93d87f4c490169094b36546bc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2511.16645","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Dominic Branford, Francesco Albarelli, Jes\\'us Rubio","submitted_at":"2025-11-20T18:51:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a comprehensive and pedagogical formulation of Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation. Within this framework, we analyse the role of measurement incompatibility and establish its quantitative effect on attainable precision. We achieve this by deriving upper bounds based on the pretty good measurement -- a notion from hypothesis testing -- combined with the evaluation of the Nagaoka--Hayashi lower bound. In general, we prove that, as in the many-copy regime of local estimation theory, incompatibility can at most double the minimum loss relative to the idealised scenario in which "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2511.16645","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2025-11-20T18:51:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"52a6e6dfa99bc2e7445b5f4138992cdf7b8f662aa914f3b28ef96f40c4fc2e6a","abstract_canon_sha256":"cd43c497eada368f2cf9eb51b061bdec4fa35c6620fad52a56f0805cf6c5cb97"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099820Z","signature_b64":"K+sqDGr+zHS+vhsD4IB7cswlg+4NNt/uBs2XFxNYzzfdXh64NO5gs33AAmKoDZQ38rV/nhA1zIngjRMugDvCAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"01a408550f90c48715e9aeb40604dfd6e8102bb93d87f4c490169094b36546bc","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099307Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099307Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Dominic Branford, Francesco Albarelli, Jes\\'us Rubio","submitted_at":"2025-11-20T18:51:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"We present a comprehensive and pedagogical formulation of Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation. Within this framework, we analyse the role of measurement incompatibility and establish its quantitative effect on attainable precision. We achieve this by deriving upper bounds based on the pretty good measurement -- a notion from hypothesis testing -- combined with the evaluation of the Nagaoka--Hayashi lower bound. In general, we prove that, as in the many-copy regime of local estimation theory, incompatibility can at most double the minimum loss relative to the idealised scenario in which "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2511.16645","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2511.16645/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2511.16645","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2511.16645v3","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2511.16645","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AGSAQVIPSDCI","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJ","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AGSAQVIP","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16978","citing_title":"Closed-form Bayesian quantum estimation of Gaussian states","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AGSAQVIP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AGSAQVIP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2511.16645&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AGSAQVIPSDCIOFPJV22AMBG723/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:33.099380+00:00"}