{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R","short_pith_number":"pith:AJLROI3G","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0257172366a2a4b765fc588666cd8fe45c5609965d7306aacbf2ba6725384fca","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.02964","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Ann Now\\'e, Diederik M. Roijers, Patrick Mannion, Roxana R\\u{a}dulescu","submitted_at":"2019-09-06T15:09:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"The majority of multi-agent system (MAS) implementations aim to optimise agents' policies with respect to a single objective, despite the fact that many real-world problem domains are inherently multi-objective in nature. Multi-objective multi-agent systems (MOMAS) explicitly consider the possible trade-offs between conflicting objective functions. We argue that, in MOMAS, such compromises should be analysed on the basis of the utility that these compromises have for the users of a system. As is standard in multi-objective optimisation, we model the user utility using utility functions that ma"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.02964","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2019-09-06T15:09:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"35c1c1e4b8cb920a60580fac7b235b4a03a8129f5c1a0ebf2a1150e9f55f5233","abstract_canon_sha256":"aa69ad2c7eea8f3565508c7bd27e6e841fb4194f7820a6885c40e77e589e3be6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034438Z","signature_b64":"d8OpkyWd1z0tb/vB8NNhXBg6jhOoPNjJj3EpRNlIA6Hpi0/F4vewk9V8fwG9N9+/XL5e23PisJCHsShW0EUuAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0257172366a2a4b765fc588666cd8fe45c5609965d7306aacbf2ba6725384fca","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.033995Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.033995Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Decision Making: A Utility-based Analysis and Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Ann Now\\'e, Diederik M. Roijers, Patrick Mannion, Roxana R\\u{a}dulescu","submitted_at":"2019-09-06T15:09:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"The majority of multi-agent system (MAS) implementations aim to optimise agents' policies with respect to a single objective, despite the fact that many real-world problem domains are inherently multi-objective in nature. Multi-objective multi-agent systems (MOMAS) explicitly consider the possible trade-offs between conflicting objective functions. We argue that, in MOMAS, such compromises should be analysed on the basis of the utility that these compromises have for the users of a system. As is standard in multi-objective optimisation, we model the user utility using utility functions that ma"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.02964","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.02964/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.02964","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.02964v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.02964","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AJLROI3GUKSL","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AJLROI3G","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AJLROI3G"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AJLROI3G","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.02964&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AJLROI3GUKSLOZP4LCDGNTMP4R/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:51:37.034049+00:00"}