{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM","short_pith_number":"pith:AMAQB7QM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"030100fe0cfb8e5cca884ac072bbc11b1a6410d03ae266135b254f49ef467f28","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.15245","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Abdelrahman Abdallah, Adam Jatowt, Bhawna Piryani, Jamshid Mozafari","submitted_at":"2025-01-25T15:27:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have drawn considerable attention in modern open-domain question answering. The effectiveness of RAG depends on the quality of the top retrieved documents. However, conventional retrieval methods sometimes fail to rank the most relevant documents at the top. In this paper, we introduce ASRank, a new re-ranking method based on scoring retrieved documents using zero-shot answer scent which relies on a pre-trained large language model to compute the likelihood of the document-derived answers aligning with the answer scent. Our approach demonstrates mark"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.15245","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-01-25T15:27:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2d4864843566cee112e5f196c107a4ad6eb58d8ec0a2bddcac31bb777e17200c","abstract_canon_sha256":"124fabc6df663656c4bc3aed86c61a7a954807eae184c97822c12a576b191fdd"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304627Z","signature_b64":"7mKEJNYjCMBbyLRoQsLkn7bpx9/3IHdN35Wtsqgni4Fwp3eZkTK0IEuuyf2c3dYNkgrHSUu8BJ/XR9ywtKiUCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"030100fe0cfb8e5cca884ac072bbc11b1a6410d03ae266135b254f49ef467f28","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304111Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304111Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Abdelrahman Abdallah, Adam Jatowt, Bhawna Piryani, Jamshid Mozafari","submitted_at":"2025-01-25T15:27:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have drawn considerable attention in modern open-domain question answering. The effectiveness of RAG depends on the quality of the top retrieved documents. However, conventional retrieval methods sometimes fail to rank the most relevant documents at the top. In this paper, we introduce ASRank, a new re-ranking method based on scoring retrieved documents using zero-shot answer scent which relies on a pre-trained large language model to compute the likelihood of the document-derived answers aligning with the answer scent. Our approach demonstrates mark"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.15245","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.15245/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.15245","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.15245v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.15245","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AMAQB7QM7OHF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUI","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AMAQB7QM","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.16757","citing_title":"How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AMAQB7QM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AMAQB7QM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.15245&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AMAQB7QM7OHFZSUIJLAHFO6BDM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:05:26.304178+00:00"}