{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN","short_pith_number":"pith:AMLCJVL5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"031624d57dcfe0a0ea8bd3bd089c863b5689a13618cec825dbb69682c646414a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.01129","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Acoustic Feature Extraction Tools for Clinical Speech Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["eess.AS"],"primary_cat":"cs.SD","authors_text":"Alexander Richardson, Anna Seo Gyeong Choi, Ryan Partlan, Sunghye Cho, Sunny Tang","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T19:26:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study compares three acoustic feature extraction toolkits (OpenSMILE, Praat, and Librosa) applied to clinical speech data from individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and healthy controls (HC). By standardizing extraction parameters across the toolkits, we analyzed speech samples from 77 SSD and 87 HC participants and found significant toolkit-dependent variations. While F0 percentiles showed high cross-toolkit correlation (r=0.962 to 0.999), measures like F0 standard deviation and formant values often had poor, even negative, agreement. Additionally, correlation patterns "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.01129","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SD","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T19:26:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":["eess.AS"],"title_canon_sha256":"eeea5eae044b33c0d967e5def7cb4b6da6711a1366d5a6d1e587a077565c212d","abstract_canon_sha256":"66753762333852eedc5f10c72d8ad635e89242ca6c2cb3e43327d6da2b9673ba"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.756209Z","signature_b64":"skYQCrUfp1Uf1wnKH5vVc9M+CxMIG3wjzNhpjEq+qJTTPmVJbwtaXp0SSbb4V2PMb62q00oCOlJPNbfBiFiHAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"031624d57dcfe0a0ea8bd3bd089c863b5689a13618cec825dbb69682c646414a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755687Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755687Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Acoustic Feature Extraction Tools for Clinical Speech Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["eess.AS"],"primary_cat":"cs.SD","authors_text":"Alexander Richardson, Anna Seo Gyeong Choi, Ryan Partlan, Sunghye Cho, Sunny Tang","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T19:26:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study compares three acoustic feature extraction toolkits (OpenSMILE, Praat, and Librosa) applied to clinical speech data from individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and healthy controls (HC). By standardizing extraction parameters across the toolkits, we analyzed speech samples from 77 SSD and 87 HC participants and found significant toolkit-dependent variations. While F0 percentiles showed high cross-toolkit correlation (r=0.962 to 0.999), measures like F0 standard deviation and formant values often had poor, even negative, agreement. Additionally, correlation patterns "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.01129","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.01129/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.01129","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.01129v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.01129","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AMLCJVL5Z7QK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AMLCJVL5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.01129","citing_title":"Comparative Evaluation of Acoustic Feature Extraction Tools for Clinical Speech Analysis","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AMLCJVL5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AMLCJVL5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.01129&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AMLCJVL5Z7QKB2UL2O6QRHEGHN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:54:47.755760+00:00"}