{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX","short_pith_number":"pith:AQBFYGZX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"04025c1b37a623487b63146c3e179a35e63993b3b8ab8fd1d819e0e8bafe4b23","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.08471","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Benchmarking Classical, Deep, and Generative Models for Human Activity Recognition","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Md Meem Hossain, Safina Showkat Ara, The Anh Han, Zia Ush Shamszaman","submitted_at":"2025-01-14T22:36:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has gained significant importance with the growing use of sensor-equipped devices and large datasets. This paper evaluates the performance of three categories of models : classical machine learning, deep learning architectures, and Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) using five key benchmark datasets of HAR (UCI-HAR, OPPORTUNITY, PAMAP2, WISDM, and Berkeley MHAD). We assess various models, including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Deep Belief Networks (DBNs), using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-sco"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.08471","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2025-01-14T22:36:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"b879e1cbed94a105fac36fd8249d19f715e9284402d76906c474a31eca1ca870","abstract_canon_sha256":"68bb012ee224cff2acb03ebe95c97878055e16a7f62fd48c331a143feba50b78"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030639Z","signature_b64":"GRJUgw+pW8F2BALyNs7RMCDzJE+HEcTlfKm9qzJ5L59Uu+E43z/T01a8Tpg5qJQkbkUbnW9aUzbFOZ5Vtgn7Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"04025c1b37a623487b63146c3e179a35e63993b3b8ab8fd1d819e0e8bafe4b23","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030184Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030184Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Benchmarking Classical, Deep, and Generative Models for Human Activity Recognition","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Md Meem Hossain, Safina Showkat Ara, The Anh Han, Zia Ush Shamszaman","submitted_at":"2025-01-14T22:36:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has gained significant importance with the growing use of sensor-equipped devices and large datasets. This paper evaluates the performance of three categories of models : classical machine learning, deep learning architectures, and Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) using five key benchmark datasets of HAR (UCI-HAR, OPPORTUNITY, PAMAP2, WISDM, and Berkeley MHAD). We assess various models, including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Deep Belief Networks (DBNs), using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-sco"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.08471","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.08471/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.08471","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.08471v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.08471","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AQBFYGZXUYRU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63D","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AQBFYGZX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13194","citing_title":"WHAR Arena: Benchmarking the State of the Art in Efficient Wearable Human Activity Recognition","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08296","citing_title":"BenchHAR: Benchmarking Self-Supervised Learning for Generalizable Sensor-based Activity Recognition","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AQBFYGZX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AQBFYGZX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.08471&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AQBFYGZXUYRUQ63DCRWD4F42GX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:01:03.030234+00:00"}