{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY","short_pith_number":"pith:AV47J5CX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0579f4f45770503945aef5588a800abe3df88a7555b47eb8b1e010072bc78c8b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.28908","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reflection or Re-Generation? Why LLM Revision Fails Where Human Revision Succeeds","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Gerald Friedland, Luyang Kong, Madhusudhanan Chandrasekaran, Yefan Tao","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T00:15:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reflection, the ability to revisit and revise prior reasoning, is central to how humans improve their answers. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly prompted to \"reflect,\" yet whether this resembles human revision remains unclear. We introduce the Human-LLM Reflection Framework (HRF), a controlled two-pass protocol comparing human and LLM revision under identical conditions across self-, peer-, and cross-agent settings. Using an information-theoretic analysis based on per-iteration cross-entropy reduction, we find two failure modes of LLM reflection. On objective tasks with finite answ"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.28908","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T00:15:32Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"10f27b3bb457f5ef85d0170c846fbb652c71e36810d7f2acd144295ab73eb89b","abstract_canon_sha256":"00f50e9f38bbd83c874202684f326fd863c2a15ed3fb7a90fddede08a2c4e45d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.767258Z","signature_b64":"A50iB4UkjHEGTQxUq6MdmtI8Seb8UQtXdN0C4SMxUyn9ZhpBkxeYhvcQ9cH8r9A2KCFglHQTh5YrcAuRUygVBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0579f4f45770503945aef5588a800abe3df88a7555b47eb8b1e010072bc78c8b","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.765628Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.765628Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reflection or Re-Generation? Why LLM Revision Fails Where Human Revision Succeeds","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Gerald Friedland, Luyang Kong, Madhusudhanan Chandrasekaran, Yefan Tao","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T00:15:32Z","abstract_excerpt":"Reflection, the ability to revisit and revise prior reasoning, is central to how humans improve their answers. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly prompted to \"reflect,\" yet whether this resembles human revision remains unclear. We introduce the Human-LLM Reflection Framework (HRF), a controlled two-pass protocol comparing human and LLM revision under identical conditions across self-, peer-, and cross-agent settings. Using an information-theoretic analysis based on per-iteration cross-entropy reduction, we find two failure modes of LLM reflection. On objective tasks with finite answ"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.28908","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.28908/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.28908","created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.28908v1","created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.28908","created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"AV47J5CXOBID","created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO","created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"AV47J5CX","created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AV47J5CX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/AV47J5CX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.28908&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/AV47J5CXOBIDSRNO6VMIVAAKXY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-03T01:17:28.766585+00:00"}