{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN","short_pith_number":"pith:B5EK5ZOL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0f48aee5cb6eb6a411ca027ea7cd0f9b44cefce0c0769280e2451b4a38cd5b6d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1704.08798","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Word Affect Intensities","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Saif M. Mohammad","submitted_at":"2017-04-28T03:33:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Words often convey affect -- emotions, feelings, and attitudes. Further, different words can convey affect to various degrees (intensities). However, existing manually created lexicons for basic emotions (such as anger and fear) indicate only coarse categories of affect association (for example, associated with anger or not associated with anger). Automatic lexicons of affect provide fine degrees of association, but they tend not to be accurate as human-created lexicons. Here, for the first time, we present a manually created affect intensity lexicon with real-valued scores of intensity for fo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1704.08798","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2017-04-28T03:33:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ab50171ea0126de747a25c2b4ab9b52e2a0be3c13afcabe03a36c27edd23d07a","abstract_canon_sha256":"4d2cce585475e543f537bd90935a7001da239333b144a418309219e6ba7e571f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.081231Z","signature_b64":"cwspPkqb5v0oADosjeGslAiEYv5jzYXmMIWskUEHEhD5AuwIB0JmM3em/hAMrfr0d/XAwAutxwxst3WWlHJCCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0f48aee5cb6eb6a411ca027ea7cd0f9b44cefce0c0769280e2451b4a38cd5b6d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080847Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080847Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Word Affect Intensities","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Saif M. Mohammad","submitted_at":"2017-04-28T03:33:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"Words often convey affect -- emotions, feelings, and attitudes. Further, different words can convey affect to various degrees (intensities). However, existing manually created lexicons for basic emotions (such as anger and fear) indicate only coarse categories of affect association (for example, associated with anger or not associated with anger). Automatic lexicons of affect provide fine degrees of association, but they tend not to be accurate as human-created lexicons. Here, for the first time, we present a manually created affect intensity lexicon with real-valued scores of intensity for fo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1704.08798","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1704.08798/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1704.08798","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1704.08798v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1704.08798","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"B5EK5ZOLN23K","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOK","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"B5EK5ZOL","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29068","citing_title":"A Comparative Study on Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Psychological Emotion Theories","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/B5EK5ZOL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/B5EK5ZOL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1704.08798&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/B5EK5ZOLN23KIEOKAJ7KPTIPTN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:06:48.080904+00:00"}