{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB","short_pith_number":"pith:BAAJREMF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"08009891858e77ea3247a24e4554c87856770bebf7a7639b9a8e802b8092504f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.15582","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Generalization vs. Specialization under Concept Shift","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.dis-nn","cond-mat.stat-mech","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Alex Nguyen, David J. Schwab, Vudtiwat Ngampruetikorn","submitted_at":"2024-09-23T22:30:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning models are often brittle under distribution shift, i.e., when data distributions at test time differ from those during training. Understanding this failure mode is central to identifying and mitigating safety risks of mass adoption of machine learning. Here we analyze ridge regression under concept shift -- a form of distribution shift in which the input-label relationship changes at test time. We derive an exact expression for prediction risk in the thermodynamic limit. Our results reveal nontrivial effects of concept shift on generalization performance, including a phase tra"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.15582","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2024-09-23T22:30:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cond-mat.dis-nn","cond-mat.stat-mech","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"c159da04be9049f25417633abad37536d76ff54354f54f6d01dacf28cefddf55","abstract_canon_sha256":"d0beb7e5c10d953727a418d64463ada428167be27a59b77b2da82ab3076d2563"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548636Z","signature_b64":"uIKzlCDO9ra5GTG84/2RzX8rTBADN1DPQFum2E5vDUNhJZzM9Y/7x4Q+jfPQnndsuL70Cf9oAyZA4Cvi+KY0Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"08009891858e77ea3247a24e4554c87856770bebf7a7639b9a8e802b8092504f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548118Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548118Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Generalization vs. Specialization under Concept Shift","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cond-mat.dis-nn","cond-mat.stat-mech","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Alex Nguyen, David J. Schwab, Vudtiwat Ngampruetikorn","submitted_at":"2024-09-23T22:30:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning models are often brittle under distribution shift, i.e., when data distributions at test time differ from those during training. Understanding this failure mode is central to identifying and mitigating safety risks of mass adoption of machine learning. Here we analyze ridge regression under concept shift -- a form of distribution shift in which the input-label relationship changes at test time. We derive an exact expression for prediction risk in the thermodynamic limit. Our results reveal nontrivial effects of concept shift on generalization performance, including a phase tra"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.15582","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.15582/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.15582","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.15582v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.15582","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BAAJREMFRZ36","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BAAJREMFRZ36UMSH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BAAJREMF","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16537","citing_title":"Robustifying and Selecting Cohort-Appropriate Prognostic Models under Distributional Shifts","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BAAJREMF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BAAJREMF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.15582&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BAAJREMFRZ36UMSHUJHEKVGIPB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:02.548180+00:00"}