{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP","short_pith_number":"pith:BC5CUFXA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"08ba2a16e011ed1290028732ee207483e00d27452ebf1fa51c357e61762a225a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2601.12120","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Lost in Aggregation: The Causal Interpretation of the IV Estimand","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Danielle Tsao, Emilija Perkovi\\'c, Frederick Eberhardt, Krikamol Muandet","submitted_at":"2026-01-17T17:43:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Instrumental variable estimation has emerged as a standard approach to mitigating confounding bias in the social sciences and epidemiology, where conducting randomized experiments can be too costly or infeasible. However, justifying the validity of the instrument is frequently challenging. We highlight a problem generally neglected in arguments for instrumental variable validity: the presence of an \"aggregate treatment variable\", where the treatment (e.g., education, GDP, caloric intake) is composed of finer-grained, unobserved components that each may have a different effect on the outcome. W"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2601.12120","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-01-17T17:43:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"6b04f882dd15762e50cda2dce581af5b9397f4602049cfdf505ef2d4bff362e3","abstract_canon_sha256":"fdcee96eb7644ea3c23e46ebfdbdba93f3b49917fda3bc7d76be127ccae8bd5d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588714Z","signature_b64":"ZN3D/Bx4x8I4Yc9w1WtVkqhqmqIMWvN94vR2j1N0w3uI9paexiX+QB+tOY0qqjIFe/tPUZRfwSL4ugcQoHySDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"08ba2a16e011ed1290028732ee207483e00d27452ebf1fa51c357e61762a225a","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.587078Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.587078Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Lost in Aggregation: The Causal Interpretation of the IV Estimand","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Danielle Tsao, Emilija Perkovi\\'c, Frederick Eberhardt, Krikamol Muandet","submitted_at":"2026-01-17T17:43:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Instrumental variable estimation has emerged as a standard approach to mitigating confounding bias in the social sciences and epidemiology, where conducting randomized experiments can be too costly or infeasible. However, justifying the validity of the instrument is frequently challenging. We highlight a problem generally neglected in arguments for instrumental variable validity: the presence of an \"aggregate treatment variable\", where the treatment (e.g., education, GDP, caloric intake) is composed of finer-grained, unobserved components that each may have a different effect on the outcome. W"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.12120","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2601.12120/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.12120","created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.12120v2","created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.12120","created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BC5CUFXACHWR","created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BC5CUFXACHWRFEAC","created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BC5CUFXA","created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.05792","citing_title":"Estimating Causal Effects from Data Generated by Stochastic Algorithms","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BC5CUFXA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BC5CUFXA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2601.12120&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BC5CUFXACHWRFEACQ4ZO4IDUQP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-04T00:30:31.588120+00:00"}