{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S","short_pith_number":"pith:BCBT4XBH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"08833e5c27028eeae6a15355162448dca7c59c8030debc8d7fe98ec5c94b7026","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2202.12958","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Angela Zhou, Michael I. Jordan, Wenshuo Guo","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T20:25:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"The intersection of causal inference and machine learning for decision-making is rapidly expanding, but the default decision criterion remains an \\textit{average} of individual causal outcomes across a population. In practice, various operational restrictions ensure that a decision-maker's utility is not realized as an \\textit{average} but rather as an \\textit{output} of a downstream decision-making problem (such as matching, assignment, network flow, minimizing predictive risk). In this work, we develop a new framework for off-policy evaluation with \\textit{policy-dependent} linear optimizati"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2202.12958","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T20:25:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e8028f75e45352354e2d0bd8cdc7425dda7b4c2b68069c86f23577899a68d998","abstract_canon_sha256":"0cf7b9cfa0dd7d725c437c036066993ae421ddcf5fd04533fa780198dc464fff"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929963Z","signature_b64":"ziTiLQMoEgFiDZrjfmSUJur0IhC8tTgEkBYWup7gzM5HdB3J6tbyJ81f9YL1wdnY1n0hZsBswnRVKF7nKBU2Bw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"08833e5c27028eeae6a15355162448dca7c59c8030debc8d7fe98ec5c94b7026","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929480Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929480Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Angela Zhou, Michael I. Jordan, Wenshuo Guo","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T20:25:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"The intersection of causal inference and machine learning for decision-making is rapidly expanding, but the default decision criterion remains an \\textit{average} of individual causal outcomes across a population. In practice, various operational restrictions ensure that a decision-maker's utility is not realized as an \\textit{average} but rather as an \\textit{output} of a downstream decision-making problem (such as matching, assignment, network flow, minimizing predictive risk). In this work, we develop a new framework for off-policy evaluation with \\textit{policy-dependent} linear optimizati"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2202.12958","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2202.12958/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2202.12958","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2202.12958v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2202.12958","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BCBT4XBHAKHO","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVB","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BCBT4XBH","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2608.12489","citing_title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","ref_index":2011,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BCBT4XBH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BCBT4XBH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2202.12958&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BCBT4XBHAKHOVZVBKNKRMJCI3S/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:13:31.929570+00:00"}