{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV","short_pith_number":"pith:BGDR4PIF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"09871e3d05bc39c47e52a96bb0b5630577edad0323fb2a0b63fb72ec1a848792","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.10462","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Safety Cases: How to Justify the Safety of Advanced AI Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"David Krueger, Joshua Clymer, Nick Gabrieli, Thomas Larsen","submitted_at":"2024-03-15T16:53:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"As AI systems become more advanced, companies and regulators will make difficult decisions about whether it is safe to train and deploy them. To prepare for these decisions, we investigate how developers could make a 'safety case,' which is a structured rationale that AI systems are unlikely to cause a catastrophe. We propose a framework for organizing a safety case and discuss four categories of arguments to justify safety: total inability to cause a catastrophe, sufficiently strong control measures, trustworthiness despite capability to cause harm, and -- if AI systems become much more power"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.10462","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-03-15T16:53:13Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"a315d732595c6ac8157377d83c7c0e43a9da3b94a0bed3c38da882cd638ab8fb","abstract_canon_sha256":"1bac3aa63f8f34ce7cd24f00a439e63345236189835268d10b62e80700fbb4f3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712669Z","signature_b64":"43WdlYxTyZvENUuhJVTWfkx9FjTIs2j9eqRIP5fzzCLL4+GgA48U+lz2WVd0XPoYbqW0tJ/jY11d36TBWc8vDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"09871e3d05bc39c47e52a96bb0b5630577edad0323fb2a0b63fb72ec1a848792","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712161Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712161Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Safety Cases: How to Justify the Safety of Advanced AI Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"David Krueger, Joshua Clymer, Nick Gabrieli, Thomas Larsen","submitted_at":"2024-03-15T16:53:13Z","abstract_excerpt":"As AI systems become more advanced, companies and regulators will make difficult decisions about whether it is safe to train and deploy them. To prepare for these decisions, we investigate how developers could make a 'safety case,' which is a structured rationale that AI systems are unlikely to cause a catastrophe. We propose a framework for organizing a safety case and discuss four categories of arguments to justify safety: total inability to cause a catastrophe, sufficiently strong control measures, trustworthiness despite capability to cause harm, and -- if AI systems become much more power"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.10462","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.10462/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.10462","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.10462v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.10462","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BGDR4PIFXQ44","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SS","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BGDR4PIF","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":9,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07766","citing_title":"Alignment Plausibility: A New Standard for Assuring AI in Healthcare","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07695","citing_title":"Institutional Red-Teaming: Deployment Rules, Not Just Models, Causally Shape Multi-Agent AI Safety","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.12618","citing_title":"\"Did you lie?\" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organisms","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08044","citing_title":"When Behavioral Safety Evaluation Fails: A Representation-Level Perspective","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2408.12935","citing_title":"AI Safety Landscape for Large Language Models: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, and Future Directions","ref_index":148,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.11473","citing_title":"Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.04984","citing_title":"Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.17753","citing_title":"The 2025 AI Agent Index: Documenting Technical and Safety Features of Deployed Agentic AI Systems","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.24966","citing_title":"Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Use","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BGDR4PIF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BGDR4PIF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.10462&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BGDR4PIFXQ44I7SSVFV3BNLDAV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:57:51.712242+00:00"}