{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX","short_pith_number":"pith:BIX2SWNU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0a2fa959b4f31f7755e1a0501e91c7b5d6e58b262da60add5f635c65cba1a883","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2211.11512","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bursting the Burden Bubble? An Assessment of Sharma et al.'s Counterfactual-based Fairness Metric","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Daan van der Weijden, Florian van der Steen, Sebastiaan Jans, Yochem van Rosmalen","submitted_at":"2022-11-21T14:54:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning has seen an increase in negative publicity in recent years, due to biased, unfair, and uninterpretable models. There is a rising interest in making machine learning models more fair for unprivileged communities, such as women or people of color. Metrics are needed to evaluate the fairness of a model. A novel metric for evaluating fairness between groups is Burden, which uses counterfactuals to approximate the average distance of negatively classified individuals in a group to the decision boundary of the model. The goal of this study is to compare Burden to statistical parity,"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2211.11512","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-11-21T14:54:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"0c65750462c08bda01d7c491fd9b705639a157524c0d1293ccc9ace94598f846","abstract_canon_sha256":"e473aba9e247add5721418b92539bb2fac146536b066fe03578ad4b8fe815ca1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399666Z","signature_b64":"5M4iSXHoFg3VNDl8Du187uvo6hIkOUh43+tJ6no3CECzZ4zZWMYDPJX349H094xi3bqrhX9zo2G73EsXVVbCBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0a2fa959b4f31f7755e1a0501e91c7b5d6e58b262da60add5f635c65cba1a883","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399250Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399250Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bursting the Burden Bubble? An Assessment of Sharma et al.'s Counterfactual-based Fairness Metric","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Daan van der Weijden, Florian van der Steen, Sebastiaan Jans, Yochem van Rosmalen","submitted_at":"2022-11-21T14:54:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning has seen an increase in negative publicity in recent years, due to biased, unfair, and uninterpretable models. There is a rising interest in making machine learning models more fair for unprivileged communities, such as women or people of color. Metrics are needed to evaluate the fairness of a model. A novel metric for evaluating fairness between groups is Burden, which uses counterfactuals to approximate the average distance of negatively classified individuals in a group to the decision boundary of the model. The goal of this study is to compare Burden to statistical parity,"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2211.11512","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2211.11512/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2211.11512","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2211.11512v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2211.11512","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BIX2SWNU6MPX","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPB","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BIX2SWNU","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18966","citing_title":"Self-Improving Tabular Language Models via Iterative Reward-Guided Post-Training","ref_index":71,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BIX2SWNU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BIX2SWNU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2211.11512&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BIX2SWNU6MPXOVPBUBIB5EOHWX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:17:54.399302+00:00"}