{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I","short_pith_number":"pith:BK5XTVIC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0abb79d502468dd906a0a5908ff155e211fe7bade57cb2a5292f197019d43a2d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.12961","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantitative Relaxations of Arrow's Axioms","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Daniel Brous, Martin T. Wells, Moon Duchin, Suvadip Sana","submitted_at":"2025-06-15T20:48:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we develop a novel approach to relaxing Arrow's axioms for voting rules, addressing a long-standing critique in social choice theory. Classical axioms (often styled as fairness axioms or fairness criteria) are assessed in a binary manner, so that a voting rule fails the axiom if it fails in even one corner case. Many authors have proposed a probabilistic framework to soften the axiomatic approach. Instead of immediately passing to random preference profiles, we begin by measuring the degree to which an axiom is upheld or violated on a given profile. We focus on two foundational a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.12961","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2025-06-15T20:48:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ad6b39087814128eef537ecaca93ff511eec7d762a65e34441f48ce3f9bed62b","abstract_canon_sha256":"245af88183d9e44595af849777ee3620710bceb540a8e77de4755f3989db9fc7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.025155Z","signature_b64":"pkXLX9Vo/jWkzJUovpJQR+lFKEdIKNIup2LmhnJjk6+Qyc+lp4u23baz18HRyWHjvpbe8HZXBemtT+fFQogoBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0abb79d502468dd906a0a5908ff155e211fe7bade57cb2a5292f197019d43a2d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024732Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024732Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantitative Relaxations of Arrow's Axioms","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Daniel Brous, Martin T. Wells, Moon Duchin, Suvadip Sana","submitted_at":"2025-06-15T20:48:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper we develop a novel approach to relaxing Arrow's axioms for voting rules, addressing a long-standing critique in social choice theory. Classical axioms (often styled as fairness axioms or fairness criteria) are assessed in a binary manner, so that a voting rule fails the axiom if it fails in even one corner case. Many authors have proposed a probabilistic framework to soften the axiomatic approach. Instead of immediately passing to random preference profiles, we begin by measuring the degree to which an axiom is upheld or violated on a given profile. We focus on two foundational a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.12961","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.12961/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.12961","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.12961v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.12961","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BK5XTVICI2G5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BK5XTVICI2G5SBVA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BK5XTVIC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BK5XTVIC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BK5XTVIC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.12961&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BK5XTVICI2G5SBVAUWII74KV4I/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:22:03.024792+00:00"}