{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM","short_pith_number":"pith:BLSOTXIB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0ae4e9dd018cdef757d1f96ecc798d233d4ccf21a0f6a2c59b94f11cd0d7f7b1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1507.02646","version":9},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Pareto Smoothed Importance Sampling","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Aki Vehtari, Andrew Gelman, Daniel Simpson, Jonah Gabry, Yuling Yao","submitted_at":"2015-07-09T18:43:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Importance weighting is a general way to adjust Monte Carlo integration to account for draws from the wrong distribution, but the resulting estimate can be highly variable when the importance ratios have a heavy right tail. This routinely occurs when there are aspects of the target distribution that are not well captured by the approximating distribution, in which case more stable estimates can be obtained by modifying extreme importance ratios. We present a new method for stabilizing importance weights using a generalized Pareto distribution fit to the upper tail of the distribution of the si"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1507.02646","kind":"arxiv","version":9},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.CO","submitted_at":"2015-07-09T18:43:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"4d37cd0b708e1288f214c3b2ea5e1f6ca329646e74f78ed7eb619473c5842400","abstract_canon_sha256":"ebd1b160816a80ef6c2af938facb6264add1b967e125604bdc7b1ab42201b017"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.938102Z","signature_b64":"aR0L85fMZ+8HpG++p5HnnZBuULrNXOOFnukNqKJd9+udOm7Vxwc2O59zj9Runxwc2go/3ln5vp1p5YiUoQ75AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0ae4e9dd018cdef757d1f96ecc798d233d4ccf21a0f6a2c59b94f11cd0d7f7b1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937630Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937630Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Pareto Smoothed Importance Sampling","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Aki Vehtari, Andrew Gelman, Daniel Simpson, Jonah Gabry, Yuling Yao","submitted_at":"2015-07-09T18:43:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Importance weighting is a general way to adjust Monte Carlo integration to account for draws from the wrong distribution, but the resulting estimate can be highly variable when the importance ratios have a heavy right tail. This routinely occurs when there are aspects of the target distribution that are not well captured by the approximating distribution, in which case more stable estimates can be obtained by modifying extreme importance ratios. We present a new method for stabilizing importance weights using a generalized Pareto distribution fit to the upper tail of the distribution of the si"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1507.02646","kind":"arxiv","version":9},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1507.02646/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1507.02646","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1507.02646v9","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1507.02646","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BLSOTXIBRTPP","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BLSOTXIB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30504","citing_title":"Rapid Hubble constant inference from GW170817 using GPU-accelerated nested sampling: prior sensitivity and the limits of post-hoc reweighting","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28489","citing_title":"pop-cosmos: Galaxy size evolution across structural and star-formation classifications in COSMOS-Web","ref_index":71,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11308","citing_title":"pop-cosmos: Disentangling galaxy properties from observables using data-driven approaches","ref_index":69,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2409.02331","citing_title":"A parameterization of anisotropic Gaussian fields with penalized complexity priors","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BLSOTXIB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BLSOTXIB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1507.02646&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BLSOTXIBRTPPOV6R7FXMY6MNEM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:06:36.937679+00:00"}