{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO","short_pith_number":"pith:BN2K37PN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0b74adfded20663fd34e99b7ab89ad6b91e320c83de85e334197993fa9ce0ab8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2312.04576","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Open Review-Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High-Energy Physics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG","hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Blerina Gkotse, Federico Ravotti, Jaroslaw Szumega, Lamine Bougueroua, Pierre Jouvelot","submitted_at":"2023-11-29T20:52:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the Open Science approach becoming important for research, the evolution towards open scientific-paper reviews is making an impact on the scientific community. However, there is a lack of publicly available resources for conducting research activities related to this subject, as only a limited number of journals and conferences currently allow access to their review process for interested parties. In this paper, we introduce the new comprehensive Open Review-Based dataset (ORB); it includes a curated list of more than 36,000 scientific papers with their more than 89,000 reviews and final "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2312.04576","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2023-11-29T20:52:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.LG","hep-ex"],"title_canon_sha256":"d7c845f07562ea3809f36a49a335811eccb785f737f90b7cdf2d1c7a9e3bb901","abstract_canon_sha256":"2c4abebef0096b9e7504bd373cd5aca0727e1a7106ef6a0f36f38b846d76b26f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842857Z","signature_b64":"Oo/dw9Kvbky/BRzfCIpxJZL/8MMYtOhcN/c5lrugnereW5RHBmHYdR8me5N2YFfNvMu1Io9W5FX2zhFPqR+nDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0b74adfded20663fd34e99b7ab89ad6b91e320c83de85e334197993fa9ce0ab8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842394Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842394Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Open Review-Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High-Energy Physics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.LG","hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Blerina Gkotse, Federico Ravotti, Jaroslaw Szumega, Lamine Bougueroua, Pierre Jouvelot","submitted_at":"2023-11-29T20:52:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the Open Science approach becoming important for research, the evolution towards open scientific-paper reviews is making an impact on the scientific community. However, there is a lack of publicly available resources for conducting research activities related to this subject, as only a limited number of journals and conferences currently allow access to their review process for interested parties. In this paper, we introduce the new comprehensive Open Review-Based dataset (ORB); it includes a curated list of more than 36,000 scientific papers with their more than 89,000 reviews and final "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2312.04576","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2312.04576/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2312.04576","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2312.04576v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2312.04576","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BN2K37PNEBTD","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BN2K37PNEBTD7U2O","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BN2K37PN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.23713","citing_title":"SocialMaze: A Benchmark for Evaluating Social Reasoning in Large Language Models","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BN2K37PN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BN2K37PN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2312.04576&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BN2K37PNEBTD7U2OTG32XCNNNO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:21:47.842449+00:00"}