{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C","short_pith_number":"pith:BPHHS7O3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0bce797ddb886901f8cb266c6c026fe8a568cb095c37b1bc638c73087ce6c505","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.11951","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"SagaLLM: Context Management, Validation, and Transaction Guarantees for Multi-Agent LLM Planning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Edward Y. Chang, Longling Geng","submitted_at":"2025-03-15T01:43:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces SagaLLM, a structured multi-agent architecture designed to address four foundational limitations of current LLM-based planning systems: unreliable self-validation, context loss, lack of transactional safeguards, and insufficient inter-agent coordination. While recent frameworks leverage LLMs for task decomposition and multi-agent communication, they often fail to ensure consistency, rollback, or constraint satisfaction across distributed workflows. SagaLLM bridges this gap by integrating the Saga transactional pattern with persistent memory, automated compensation, and in"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.11951","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-03-15T01:43:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"56a627cb8275d2f0fe73eafeb9577ccd2fd57a3b467a7002336aa602b658710e","abstract_canon_sha256":"c34a6c5937b94f3cc4652a20f70aa03e51d32e5a027ce646517ee054252342b3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.926478Z","signature_b64":"UlXEK6vBcq8YDUqCDX1+mkXZeDBs8nss5sZQC76+Vf2HOdlwtVaWAx7SMTZKBN0l55vkRDZEgcXUtq/XdFQAAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0bce797ddb886901f8cb266c6c026fe8a568cb095c37b1bc638c73087ce6c505","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925912Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925912Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"SagaLLM: Context Management, Validation, and Transaction Guarantees for Multi-Agent LLM Planning","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Edward Y. Chang, Longling Geng","submitted_at":"2025-03-15T01:43:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces SagaLLM, a structured multi-agent architecture designed to address four foundational limitations of current LLM-based planning systems: unreliable self-validation, context loss, lack of transactional safeguards, and insufficient inter-agent coordination. While recent frameworks leverage LLMs for task decomposition and multi-agent communication, they often fail to ensure consistency, rollback, or constraint satisfaction across distributed workflows. SagaLLM bridges this gap by integrating the Saga transactional pattern with persistent memory, automated compensation, and in"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.11951","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.11951/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.11951","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.11951v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.11951","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BPHHS7O3RBUQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GL","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BPHHS7O3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17182","citing_title":"Verified Detection and Prevention of Concurrency Anomalies in Multi-Agent Large Language Model Systems","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30052","citing_title":"REPOT: Recoverable Program-of-Thought via Checkpoint Repair","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23311","citing_title":"DART: Semantic Recoverability for Structured Tool Agents","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.04474","citing_title":"From Spark to Fire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.13334","citing_title":"A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models","ref_index":128,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BPHHS7O3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BPHHS7O3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.11951&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BPHHS7O3RBUQD6GLEZWGYATP5C/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:05.925985+00:00"}