{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT","short_pith_number":"pith:BPJJI4ZH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0bd2947327238c5579344bd060b55fccd34e5f06b98bf7be9423b05f995391b3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.08724","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Firewalls From General Covariance","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Raphael Bousso","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T19:00:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"I define \"horizon normalcy\" as the approximate validity of Semiclassical Gravity and Effective Field Theory (SGEFT), for the description of observers that approach or cross a black hole horizon. If black holes return information, then horizon normalcy must fail substantially, at least in some global states. Proposals such as ER=EPR and nonisometric maps assert that horizon normalcy persists, so long as the Hawking radiation remains in a computationally simple state. Here I argue that state-dependent horizon normalcy - independently of the underlying mechanism, and independently of the class of"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.08724","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T19:00:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"b934f09fc72484f1db3f49375cc7d5cd892b6cae3c982ea00340944e737312be","abstract_canon_sha256":"f12799d6e37da2d009670ef69cc58ea5a5ac8a90db912835df40d71d615af410"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.013373Z","signature_b64":"FTMlDziuCBwQ5SCdomlNiJyw2uUhISGlp6Z3l9RjtKTRQplAl80oPIHzjRceDzVpMTDgBOvs7rqVV/x/u4j1DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0bd2947327238c5579344bd060b55fccd34e5f06b98bf7be9423b05f995391b3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012845Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012845Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Firewalls From General Covariance","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Raphael Bousso","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T19:00:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"I define \"horizon normalcy\" as the approximate validity of Semiclassical Gravity and Effective Field Theory (SGEFT), for the description of observers that approach or cross a black hole horizon. If black holes return information, then horizon normalcy must fail substantially, at least in some global states. Proposals such as ER=EPR and nonisometric maps assert that horizon normalcy persists, so long as the Hawking radiation remains in a computationally simple state. Here I argue that state-dependent horizon normalcy - independently of the underlying mechanism, and independently of the class of"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.08724","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.08724/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.08724","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.08724v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.08724","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BPJJI4ZHEOGF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BPJJI4ZH","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20294","citing_title":"Topology sums, sectorwise holography, and horizon normalcy","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20165","citing_title":"Entropy bound and the non-universality of entanglement islands","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BPJJI4ZH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BPJJI4ZH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.08724&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BPJJI4ZHEOGFK6JUJPIGBNK7ZT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:13:29.012912+00:00"}