{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W","short_pith_number":"pith:BPLQSFMB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0bd7091581e293beddb8effe5ebce3fdabc5abbeb4123ed707f7bc52611825b1","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.02082","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Using Detector Likelihood for Benchmarking Quantum Error Correction","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Bence Het\\'enyi, Ian Hesner, James R. Wootton","submitted_at":"2024-08-04T16:34:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"The behavior of real quantum hardware differs strongly from the simple error models typically used when simulating quantum error correction. Error processes are far more complex than simple depolarizing noise applied to single gates, and error rates can vary greatly between different qubits, and at different points in the circuit. Nevertheless, it would be useful to distill all this complicated behavior down to a single parameter: an effective error rate for a simple uniform error model. Here we show that this can be done by means of the average detector likelihood, which quantifies the rate a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.02082","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2024-08-04T16:34:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bde6af9229193f55f0e63f8f372c8e8809eec8faf67b1c6699bc6644164e7877","abstract_canon_sha256":"353a9be6356da10593fb77329248952f8abce792e9940d6a86b8e214f9b5a543"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216391Z","signature_b64":"iBiZJsOV9NxO7IwFLmLW4U1PjHFIELVErQM6iNYXj2I61HQfhAKQtojRaj7Dp7aiRxC0iqp1eRjENxNxI7hmDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0bd7091581e293beddb8effe5ebce3fdabc5abbeb4123ed707f7bc52611825b1","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.215926Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.215926Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Using Detector Likelihood for Benchmarking Quantum Error Correction","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Bence Het\\'enyi, Ian Hesner, James R. Wootton","submitted_at":"2024-08-04T16:34:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"The behavior of real quantum hardware differs strongly from the simple error models typically used when simulating quantum error correction. Error processes are far more complex than simple depolarizing noise applied to single gates, and error rates can vary greatly between different qubits, and at different points in the circuit. Nevertheless, it would be useful to distill all this complicated behavior down to a single parameter: an effective error rate for a simple uniform error model. Here we show that this can be done by means of the average detector likelihood, which quantifies the rate a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.02082","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.02082/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.02082","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.02082v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.02082","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BPLQSFMB4KJ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BPLQSFMB","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04079","citing_title":"Quantum error correction with the toric code","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.16228","citing_title":"Soft information decoding with superconducting qubits","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BPLQSFMB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BPLQSFMB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.02082&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BPLQSFMB4KJ35XNY577F5PHD7W/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:07.216030+00:00"}