{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F","short_pith_number":"pith:BRL77DLW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0c57ff8d76a7df2586a2def4a2c55fe972cf239621ba347bb2ef1f071d8b8696","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.11618","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Optimal CO2 storage management considering safety constraints in multi-stakeholder multi-site CCS projects: a Markov game perspective","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Jungang Chen, Seyyed A. Hosseini","submitted_at":"2025-08-15T17:36:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects typically involve a diverse array of stakeholders or players from public, private, and regulatory sectors, each with different objectives and responsibilities. Given the complexity, scale, and long-term nature of CCS operations, determining whether individual stakeholders can independently maximize their interests or whether collaborative coalition agreements are needed remains a central question for effective CCS project planning and management. CCS projects are often implemented in geologically connected sites, where shared geological features such a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.11618","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-08-15T17:36:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c22dc85e7df3107ccb2c21bad5f93b0b16bdaf754ef400c5d2ca945d795dad09","abstract_canon_sha256":"471668f96e16e76b93563959125e017bc5058d4747789fd609d0ad0b2f4aadf1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781665Z","signature_b64":"6aIHBmkwwrXnsv/BCrV+XK358xrMORvJx6QWj9STBcfyyCAJxkYwNOkXoc71laoWBSXg/hcAPmqZlg3IJY8lBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0c57ff8d76a7df2586a2def4a2c55fe972cf239621ba347bb2ef1f071d8b8696","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781151Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781151Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Optimal CO2 storage management considering safety constraints in multi-stakeholder multi-site CCS projects: a Markov game perspective","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Jungang Chen, Seyyed A. Hosseini","submitted_at":"2025-08-15T17:36:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects typically involve a diverse array of stakeholders or players from public, private, and regulatory sectors, each with different objectives and responsibilities. Given the complexity, scale, and long-term nature of CCS operations, determining whether individual stakeholders can independently maximize their interests or whether collaborative coalition agreements are needed remains a central question for effective CCS project planning and management. CCS projects are often implemented in geologically connected sites, where shared geological features such a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.11618","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.11618/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.11618","created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.11618v2","created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.11618","created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BRL77DLWU7PS","created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC","created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BRL77DLW","created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00859","citing_title":"Risk sharing in cooperative game models for CO$_2$ storage with uncertain geology and pressure competition","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BRL77DLW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BRL77DLW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.11618&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BRL77DLWU7PSLBVC332KFRK75F/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-05T00:13:43.781210+00:00"}