{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD","short_pith_number":"pith:BRWYAOP6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0c6d8039fe859388726bed8a5da20738d87b10387c424b79d059df5f7c03d2ee","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.01812","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Post-Abstention: Towards Reliably Re-Attempting the Abstained Instances in QA","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chitta Baral, Neeraj Varshney","submitted_at":"2023-05-02T22:40:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite remarkable progress made in natural language processing, even the state-of-the-art models often make incorrect predictions. Such predictions hamper the reliability of systems and limit their widespread adoption in real-world applications. 'Selective prediction' partly addresses the above concern by enabling models to abstain from answering when their predictions are likely to be incorrect. While selective prediction is advantageous, it leaves us with a pertinent question 'what to do after abstention'. To this end, we present an explorative study on 'Post-Abstention', a task that allows"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.01812","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-05-02T22:40:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bf28df15e48164befbe01c7956cd1af56ede1205201835ec95e9d83592f48e16","abstract_canon_sha256":"6d7a35a97f8d03084a79d2eb7dfb468fcd0e5acddf7deba61f04264b1472f746"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568838Z","signature_b64":"ZVbj6/s9dDCNpk5PTMLkgJ9QT3YbNAqCcIpcOFopVQ5pqjUIzQiMdKqBRZU1A2Ek1hN2gTyaa8kpNjxQIPYuAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0c6d8039fe859388726bed8a5da20738d87b10387c424b79d059df5f7c03d2ee","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568431Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568431Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Post-Abstention: Towards Reliably Re-Attempting the Abstained Instances in QA","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chitta Baral, Neeraj Varshney","submitted_at":"2023-05-02T22:40:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite remarkable progress made in natural language processing, even the state-of-the-art models often make incorrect predictions. Such predictions hamper the reliability of systems and limit their widespread adoption in real-world applications. 'Selective prediction' partly addresses the above concern by enabling models to abstain from answering when their predictions are likely to be incorrect. While selective prediction is advantageous, it leaves us with a pertinent question 'what to do after abstention'. To this end, we present an explorative study on 'Post-Abstention', a task that allows"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.01812","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.01812/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.01812","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.01812v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.01812","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BRWYAOP6QWJY","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BRWYAOP6","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.04565","citing_title":"PassiveQA: A Three-Action Framework for Epistemically Calibrated Question Answering via Supervised Finetuning","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BRWYAOP6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BRWYAOP6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.01812&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BRWYAOP6QWJYQ4TL5WFF3IQHHD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:06:32.568487+00:00"}