{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ","short_pith_number":"pith:BSMEITWI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0c98444ec8efe66819026a94ef9f776a72451d877b96e4739000b696ab9cc3f0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1205.0394","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The transition mass-loss rate: Calibrating the role of line-driven winds in massive star evolution","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.CO","astro-ph.GA","astro-ph.HE"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"G\\\"otz Gr\\\"afener (Armagh Observatory), Jorick S. Vink","submitted_at":"2012-05-02T11:50:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"A debate has arisen regarding the importance of stationary versus eruptive mass loss for massive star evolution. The reason is that stellar winds have been found to be clumped, which results in the reduction of unclumped empirical mass-loss rates. Most stellar evolution models employ theoretical mass-loss rates which are already reduced by a moderate factor of ~2-3 compared to non-corrected empirical rates. A key question is whether these reduced rates are of the correct order of magnitude, or if they should be reduced even further, which would mean that the alternative of eruptive mass loss b"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1205.0394","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","submitted_at":"2012-05-02T11:50:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.CO","astro-ph.GA","astro-ph.HE"],"title_canon_sha256":"bd69d6acbb4e69c2a6466f78a0924713b8f39aa85977845d6bd50d175122bb08","abstract_canon_sha256":"8c9cccc5a1bbfbe3cd5293cc19a6db7e626fb6e0e6f073bb42b6fae5a3a74a45"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.058031Z","signature_b64":"c2teu1F8km1tqBPn4TZFSZw3JEtoC1+gIGpJmFW+Cl07fHWrrVvT5sgNOmYirpT1/KiaJq/7H32HmiO0q2sPAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0c98444ec8efe66819026a94ef9f776a72451d877b96e4739000b696ab9cc3f0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057403Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057403Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The transition mass-loss rate: Calibrating the role of line-driven winds in massive star evolution","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.CO","astro-ph.GA","astro-ph.HE"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"G\\\"otz Gr\\\"afener (Armagh Observatory), Jorick S. Vink","submitted_at":"2012-05-02T11:50:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"A debate has arisen regarding the importance of stationary versus eruptive mass loss for massive star evolution. The reason is that stellar winds have been found to be clumped, which results in the reduction of unclumped empirical mass-loss rates. Most stellar evolution models employ theoretical mass-loss rates which are already reduced by a moderate factor of ~2-3 compared to non-corrected empirical rates. A key question is whether these reduced rates are of the correct order of magnitude, or if they should be reduced even further, which would mean that the alternative of eruptive mass loss b"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1205.0394","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1205.0394","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1205.0394v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1205.0394","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BSMEITWI57TG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:01.376967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BSMEITWI57TGQGIC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:01.376967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BSMEITWI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:01.376967+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.02725","citing_title":"Can current models predict the local black hole merger rate?","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BSMEITWI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BSMEITWI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1205.0394&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BSMEITWI57TGQGICNKKO7H3XNJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057495+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:57:39.057495+00:00"}