{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG","short_pith_number":"pith:BSPSX4DH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0c9f2bf067b30b07314193ecbbf2b001b71912af4f3ed9a0a1cc1f77a60b0a16","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1704.06491","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"David Mawdsley, Hayley Jones, Jelena Savovi\\'c, Julian Higgins, Kirsty Rhodes, Rebecca Turner","submitted_at":"2017-04-21T11:41:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Objective: We investigated the associations between risk of bias judgments from Cochrane reviews for sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding and between-trial heterogeneity.\n  Study Design and Setting: Bayesian hierarchical models were fitted to binary data from 117 meta-analyses, to estimate the ratio {\\lambda} by which heterogeneity changes for trials at high/unclear risk of bias, compared to trials at low risk of bias. We estimated the proportion of between-trial heterogeneity in each meta-analysis that could be explained by the bias associated with specific design characte"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1704.06491","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2017-04-21T11:41:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"da5d5dd3138e71453221bc635d600102f1e65716e7a1add5722a049848a94d15","abstract_canon_sha256":"b8eb67fb17f110ffae9e433b59ae3fb93b8f9211bb1f37a6a936aedd7eca0404"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.149682Z","signature_b64":"WmLHZf2OcShdR4EoAG/B4TrRxA4zwPce1TkfqxJbvrXwpjkELfPbFTKwrVKaGnU2GYAyXIjBmLhauRFAjwO/CQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0c9f2bf067b30b07314193ecbbf2b001b71912af4f3ed9a0a1cc1f77a60b0a16","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.148982Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.148982Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"David Mawdsley, Hayley Jones, Jelena Savovi\\'c, Julian Higgins, Kirsty Rhodes, Rebecca Turner","submitted_at":"2017-04-21T11:41:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"Objective: We investigated the associations between risk of bias judgments from Cochrane reviews for sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding and between-trial heterogeneity.\n  Study Design and Setting: Bayesian hierarchical models were fitted to binary data from 117 meta-analyses, to estimate the ratio {\\lambda} by which heterogeneity changes for trials at high/unclear risk of bias, compared to trials at low risk of bias. We estimated the proportion of between-trial heterogeneity in each meta-analysis that could be explained by the bias associated with specific design characte"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1704.06491","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1704.06491","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.149086+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1704.06491v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.149086+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1704.06491","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.149086+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BSPSX4DHWMFQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:08.081275+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:08.081275+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BSPSX4DH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:08.081275+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BSPSX4DH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BSPSX4DH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1704.06491&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BSPSX4DHWMFQOMKBSPWLX4VQAG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.149086+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:29:39.149086+00:00"}