{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2","short_pith_number":"pith:BXAO67HZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0dc0ef7cf92467000b429f433cabb6b68bf5ca9f62df2497dd0a4567a11a9f67","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2003.07588","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revisiting the $\\Omega(2012)$ as a hadronic molecule and its strong decays","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","nucl-ex","nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Chun-Hua Zeng, En Wang, Ju-Jun Xie, Jun-Xu Lu, Li-Sheng Geng","submitted_at":"2020-03-17T09:04:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, the Belle collaboration measured the ratios of the branching fractions of the newly observed $\\Omega(2012)$ excited state. They did not observe significant signals for the $\\Omega(2012) \\to \\bar{K} \\Xi^*(1530) \\to \\bar{K} \\pi \\Xi$ decay, and reported an upper limit for the ratio of the three body decay to the two body decay mode of $\\Omega(2012) \\to \\bar{K} \\Xi$. In this work, we revisit the newly observed $\\Omega(2012)$ from the molecular perspective where this resonance appears to be a dynamically generated state with spin-parity $3/2^-$ from the coupled channels interactions of th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2003.07588","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-03-17T09:04:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","nucl-ex","nucl-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"8e635f3b9e9c189b7256dd9a7986741f8a829a05327a2e0dd9f51d18fc0dbef7","abstract_canon_sha256":"d8acb7df1bc2744b61df6070467681fc2fd0cd617ca2c0533f65160d285a21a6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040917Z","signature_b64":"GakLAbhoGqDgaHKtP630taUL+v8uVJy//1UOap+k/q9C82loTHNz+ttqbJgKB6wRBaS3DN2aNd2QbnSEJhCCCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0dc0ef7cf92467000b429f433cabb6b68bf5ca9f62df2497dd0a4567a11a9f67","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040456Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040456Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting the $\\Omega(2012)$ as a hadronic molecule and its strong decays","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","nucl-ex","nucl-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Chun-Hua Zeng, En Wang, Ju-Jun Xie, Jun-Xu Lu, Li-Sheng Geng","submitted_at":"2020-03-17T09:04:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recently, the Belle collaboration measured the ratios of the branching fractions of the newly observed $\\Omega(2012)$ excited state. They did not observe significant signals for the $\\Omega(2012) \\to \\bar{K} \\Xi^*(1530) \\to \\bar{K} \\pi \\Xi$ decay, and reported an upper limit for the ratio of the three body decay to the two body decay mode of $\\Omega(2012) \\to \\bar{K} \\Xi$. In this work, we revisit the newly observed $\\Omega(2012)$ from the molecular perspective where this resonance appears to be a dynamically generated state with spin-parity $3/2^-$ from the coupled channels interactions of th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2003.07588","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2003.07588/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2003.07588","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2003.07588v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2003.07588","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BXAO67HZERTQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BXAO67HZERTQAC2C","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BXAO67HZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25630","citing_title":"Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the $\\Omega(2012)$, $\\Omega(2380)$, and $\\Omega_c(3120)$ via femtoscopy correlation functions","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25630","citing_title":"Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the $\\Omega(2012)$, $\\Omega(2380)$, and $\\Omega_c(3120)$ via femtoscopy correlation functions","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BXAO67HZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BXAO67HZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2003.07588&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BXAO67HZERTQAC2CT5BTZK5WW2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:13:59.040516+00:00"}