{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU","short_pith_number":"pith:BZBRFPJI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"0e4312bd2838b22fe68a18957d64038d0a324e4539986ad2bc7ccee84dcb6827","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.02379","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Contribution of XAI for the Safe Development and Certification of AI: An Expert-Based Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Andreas Aichele, Benjamin Fresz, Danilo Brajovic, Janika Kutz, Jens Neuh\\\"uttler, Marco F. Huber, Safa Omri, Vincent Philipp G\\\"obels","submitted_at":"2024-07-22T16:08:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Developing and certifying safe - or so-called trustworthy - AI has become an increasingly salient issue, especially in light of upcoming regulation such as the EU AI Act. In this context, the black-box nature of machine learning models limits the use of conventional avenues of approach towards certifying complex technical systems. As a potential solution, methods to give insights into this black-box - devised in the field of eXplainable AI (XAI) - could be used. In this study, the potential and shortcomings of such methods for the purpose of safe AI development and certification are discussed "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.02379","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-07-22T16:08:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"6cf4cb83cb70d096469397ac0120cf68f26be50df5d72d5e3cd41be5af037f6b","abstract_canon_sha256":"0b634a4a5f2fd08302d17af72e9f106fd44faa292f4812f0943fafe3d706ad32"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.989367Z","signature_b64":"huYk53mrrk64lIgEV5jYHBoBAaBJEI68F0h7T3Mp4lmrytM3pUYo/S142IxdUqZWF7AGl870hGv9h0DeFWZwAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"0e4312bd2838b22fe68a18957d64038d0a324e4539986ad2bc7ccee84dcb6827","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988932Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988932Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Contribution of XAI for the Safe Development and Certification of AI: An Expert-Based Analysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Andreas Aichele, Benjamin Fresz, Danilo Brajovic, Janika Kutz, Jens Neuh\\\"uttler, Marco F. Huber, Safa Omri, Vincent Philipp G\\\"obels","submitted_at":"2024-07-22T16:08:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Developing and certifying safe - or so-called trustworthy - AI has become an increasingly salient issue, especially in light of upcoming regulation such as the EU AI Act. In this context, the black-box nature of machine learning models limits the use of conventional avenues of approach towards certifying complex technical systems. As a potential solution, methods to give insights into this black-box - devised in the field of eXplainable AI (XAI) - could be used. In this study, the potential and shortcomings of such methods for the purpose of safe AI development and certification are discussed "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.02379","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.02379/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.02379","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.02379v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.02379","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"BZBRFPJIHCZC","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"BZBRFPJI","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05461","citing_title":"Output Type Before Quality: A Standards-Derived XAI Admissibility Rubric for Autonomous-Driving Safety","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BZBRFPJI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/BZBRFPJI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.02379&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/BZBRFPJIHCZC7ZUKDCKX2ZADRU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:11.988988+00:00"}